[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving
From: |
Mark Cave-Ayland |
Subject: |
[Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:57:47 -0000 |
Great! It looks as if I can't add Stefan to the bug report in launchpad
since he isn't registered there, so I'll send a quick email to qemu-
devel and add him as CC.
In the meantime whilst your test setup is working and everything is
fresh, I'll have a quick go at switching the BCD_DIG_BYTE bits over to
use the VsrX() macros to abstract out more host endian behaviour...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841990
Title:
instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving
Status in QEMU:
New
Bug description:
Instruction 'denbcdq' appears to have no effect. Test case attached.
On ppc64le native:
--
gcc -g -O -mcpu=power9 bcdcfsq.c test-denbcdq.c -o test-denbcdq
$ ./test-denbcdq
0x00000000000000000000000000000000
0x0000000000000000000000000000000c
0x22080000000000000000000000000000
$ ./test-denbcdq 1
0x00000000000000000000000000000001
0x0000000000000000000000000000001c
0x22080000000000000000000000000001
$ ./test-denbcdq $(seq 0 99)
0x00000000000000000000000000000064
0x0000000000000000000000000000100c
0x22080000000000000000000000000080
--
With "qemu-ppc64le -cpu power9"
--
$ qemu-ppc64le -cpu power9 -L [...] ./test-denbcdq
0x00000000000000000000000000000000
0x0000000000000000000000000000000c
0x0000000000000000000000000000000c
$ qemu-ppc64le -cpu power9 -L [...] ./test-denbcdq 1
0x00000000000000000000000000000001
0x0000000000000000000000000000001c
0x0000000000000000000000000000001c
$ qemu-ppc64le -cpu power9 -L [...] ./test-denbcdq $(seq 100)
0x00000000000000000000000000000064
0x0000000000000000000000000000100c
0x0000000000000000000000000000100c
--
I started looking at the code, but I got confused rather quickly.
Could be related to endianness? I think denbcdq arrived on the scene
before little-endian was a big deal. Maybe something to do with
utilizing implicit floating-point register pairs... I don't think the
right data is getting to helper_denbcdq, which would point back to the
gen_fprp_ptr uses in dfp-impl.inc.c (GEN_DFP_T_FPR_I32_Rc). (Maybe?)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1841990/+subscriptions
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving, (continued)
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving, Paul Clarke, 2019/09/25
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/25
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving, Paul Clarke, 2019/09/25
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/26
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving, Paul Clarke, 2019/09/26
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/26
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving, Paul Clarke, 2019/09/26
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving, Paul Clarke, 2019/09/26
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/26
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving, Paul Clarke, 2019/09/26
- [Bug 1841990] Re: instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving,
Mark Cave-Ayland <=