[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/4] xics: Eliminate unnecessary class
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/4] xics: Eliminate unnecessary class |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:06:47 +0200 |
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:47:51 +0200
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 9/24/19 6:59 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > The XICS interrupt controller device used to have separate subtypes
> > for the KVM and non-KVM variant of the device. That was a bad idea,
> > because it leaked information that should be entirely host-side
> > implementation specific to the kinda-sorta guest visible QOM class
> > names.
> >
> > We eliminated the KVM specific class some time ago, but it's left
> > behind a distinction between the TYPE_ICS_BASE abstract class and
> > TYPE_ICS_SIMPLE subtype which no longer serves any purpose.
> >
> > This series collapses the two types back into one.
> >
> > David Gibson (4):
> > xics: Eliminate 'reject', 'resend' and 'eoi' class hooks
> > xics: Merge reset and realize hooks
> > xics: Rename misleading ics_simple_*() functions
> > xics: Merge TYPE_ICS_BASE and TYPE_ICS_SIMPLE classes
>
> Please remove the qemu_register_reset() call in hw/intc/xics.c,
No. This is needed because the XICS devices don't sit in a bus and
dc->reset doesn't get called by anyone.
> then for the series:
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] xics: Merge TYPE_ICS_BASE and TYPE_ICS_SIMPLE classes, (continued)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] xics: Eliminate unnecessary class, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/09/24
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] xics: Eliminate unnecessary class,
Greg Kurz <=