qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 0/6] tests/acceptance: Add tests f


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 0/6] tests/acceptance: Add tests for the PReP/40p machine
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 21:40:06 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:19:52PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:56:06AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 9/16/19 11:52 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > > 
> > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> writes:
> > > 
> > >> Hi David,
> > >>
> > >> On 9/16/19 2:42 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > >>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 11:19:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > >>>> Quick tests worth to avoid regressions with the 40p machine.
> > >>>> idea from the "Maintainers, please tell us how to boot your machines"
> > >>>> thread:
> > >>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-03/msg04177.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>> v2: Split Travis job, added Hervé R-b tag
> > >>>> v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg05896.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Phil.
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm guessing you're expecting these to go in via the testing tree, in
> > >>> which case
> > >>>
> > >>> Acked-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks, appreciated :)
> > >>
> > >>> Or do you want me to take them via the ppc tree?
> > >>
> > >> I think the 'testing tree' should focus on the CI/testing
> > >> infrastructure, while each subsystem maintainers should care about the
> > >> tests covering their subsystem (the testing tree maintainers might not
> > >> have the required knowledge to be sure a test is correctly implemented).
> > >>
> > >> In this particular case I assume you don't have much knowledge of that
> > >> PPC machine, which is a hobbyist one, but since you are the PPC
> > >> maintainer, I'd rather see this going via your tree :)
> > >>
> > >> Alex/Cleber/Eduardo, any comment on this position?
> > > 
> > > Once we have a .travis.yml I'm happy with it can go in via another tree
> > > no problem. See other thread....
> > 
> > Good :)
> > 
> > David can take patches 1-5 (I tagged patch 6 as RFC but messed something
> > with git-publish and lost it when I sent this series).
> 
> Ok, I've taken patches 1-5 into my ppc-for-4.2 tree.

Hrm.  Judging by both the continued comments on this thread, and the
fact it breaks the travis build, seems like this series needs a little
more work.  I've pulled it out of ppc-for-4.2 again, and I'll wait for
the next spin.

> 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > >>>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (6):
> > >>>>   tests/acceptance: Add test that runs NetBSD 4.0 installer on PRep/40p
> > >>>>   tests/acceptance: Test Open Firmware on the PReP/40p
> > >>>>   tests/acceptance: Test OpenBIOS on the PReP/40p
> > >>>>   tests/acceptance: Test Sandalfoot initrd on the PReP/40p
> > >>>>   .travis.yml: Let the avocado job run the 40p tests
> > >>>>   .travis.yml: Split enterprise vs. hobbyist acceptance test job
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  .travis.yml                      |  18 +++-
> > >>>>  MAINTAINERS                      |   1 +
> > >>>>  tests/acceptance/ppc_prep_40p.py | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >>>>  3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >>>>  create mode 100644 tests/acceptance/ppc_prep_40p.py
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 



-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]