qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 18/32] riscv: sifive_u: Set the minimum numbe


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 18/32] riscv: sifive_u: Set the minimum number of cpus to 2
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:02:56 -0700

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 6:07 AM Bin Meng <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 3:00 AM Palmer Dabbelt <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:25:21 PDT (-0700), address@hidden wrote:
> > > Hi Palmer,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:33 PM Palmer Dabbelt <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 06 Sep 2019 09:20:05 PDT (-0700), address@hidden wrote:
> > >> > It is not useful if we only have one management CPU.
> > >> >
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <address@hidden>
> > >> > Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
> > >> >
> > >> > ---
> > >> >
> > >> > Changes in v8: None
> > >> > Changes in v7: None
> > >> > Changes in v6: None
> > >> > Changes in v5: None
> > >> > Changes in v4: None
> > >> > Changes in v3:
> > >> > - use management cpu count + 1 for the min_cpus
> > >> >
> > >> > Changes in v2:
> > >> > - update the file header to indicate at least 2 harts are created
> > >> >
> > >> >  hw/riscv/sifive_u.c         | 4 +++-
> > >> >  include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h | 2 ++
> > >> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >> >
> > >> > diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> > >> > index 2947e06..2023b71 100644
> > >> > --- a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> > >> > +++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> > >> > @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@
> > >> >   * 1) CLINT (Core Level Interruptor)
> > >> >   * 2) PLIC (Platform Level Interrupt Controller)
> > >> >   *
> > >> > - * This board currently uses a hardcoded devicetree that indicates 
> > >> > one hart.
> > >> > + * This board currently generates devicetree dynamically that 
> > >> > indicates at least
> > >> > + * two harts.
> > >> >   *
> > >> >   * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or 
> > >> > modify it
> > >> >   * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> > >> > @@ -433,6 +434,7 @@ static void 
> > >> > riscv_sifive_u_machine_init(MachineClass *mc)
> > >> >       * management CPU.
> > >> >       */
> > >> >      mc->max_cpus = 4;
> > >> > +    mc->min_cpus = SIFIVE_U_MANAGEMENT_CPU_COUNT + 1;
> > >> >  }
> > >> >
> > >> >  DEFINE_MACHINE("sifive_u", riscv_sifive_u_machine_init)
> > >> > diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h
> > >> > index f25bad8..6d22741 100644
> > >> > --- a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h
> > >> > +++ b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h
> > >> > @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ enum {
> > >> >      SIFIVE_U_GEM_CLOCK_FREQ = 125000000
> > >> >  };
> > >> >
> > >> > +#define SIFIVE_U_MANAGEMENT_CPU_COUNT   1
> > >> > +
> > >> >  #define SIFIVE_U_PLIC_HART_CONFIG "MS"
> > >> >  #define SIFIVE_U_PLIC_NUM_SOURCES 54
> > >> >  #define SIFIVE_U_PLIC_NUM_PRIORITIES 7
> > >>
> > >> This fails "make check", so I'm going to squash in this
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> > >> index ca9f7fea41..adecbf1dd9 100644
> > >> --- a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> > >> +++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> > >> @@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ static void riscv_sifive_u_machine_init(MachineClass 
> > >> *mc)
> > >>      mc->init = riscv_sifive_u_init;
> > >>      mc->max_cpus = SIFIVE_U_MANAGEMENT_CPU_COUNT + 
> > >> SIFIVE_U_COMPUTE_CPU_COUNT;
> > >>      mc->min_cpus = SIFIVE_U_MANAGEMENT_CPU_COUNT + 1;
> > >> +    mc->default_cpus = mc->max_cpus;
> > >
> > > Thank you for fixing the 'make check'. Shouldn't it be:
> > >
> > > mc->default_cpus = mc->min_cpus;
> >
> > We have 5 harts on the board that this matches, so I figured that'd be the
> > better default.
> >
>
> Per my understanding mc->default_cpus is used when invoking QEMU
> without passing '-smp n' (that's what 'make check' uses), and with the
> updated sifive_u machine, '-smp 2' is the actual useful configuration
> to boot Linux. For consistency with user experience on other machines,
> without '-smp' means we want a uni-processor machine hence I would
> suggest we set "mc->default_cpus = mc->min_cpus".

Agreed!

Alistair

>
> Regards,
> Bin
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]