qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v10 10/11] tests: add dummy ACPI tables


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v10 10/11] tests: add dummy ACPI tables for arm/virt board
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:57:06 +0100

On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 09:58, Shameer Kolothum
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> This patch is in preparation for adding numamem and memhp tests
> to arm/virt board so that 'make check' is happy. This may not
> be required once the scripts are run and new tables are
> generated with ".numamem" and ".memhp" extensions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <address@hidden>
> ---
> I am not sure this is the right way to do this. But without this, when
> the numamem and memhp tests are added, you will get,
>
> Looking for expected file 'tests/data/acpi/virt/SRAT.numamem'
> Looking for expected file 'tests/data/acpi/virt/SRAT'
> **
> ERROR:tests/bios-tables-test.c:327:load_expected_aml: assertion failed: 
> (exp_sdt.aml_file)
>
> ---
>  tests/data/acpi/virt/SLIT | Bin 0 -> 48 bytes
>  tests/data/acpi/virt/SRAT | Bin 0 -> 224 bytes
>  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tests/data/acpi/virt/SLIT
>  create mode 100644 tests/data/acpi/virt/SRAT

Do the tests pass with this patch and without the
patch that adds the tests? (That is, can we keep the
two patches separate without breaking bisection, or
do we need to squash them together?)

I'll leave it to somebody who understands the ACPI
tests stuff to answer whether there's a better way to
do this.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]