qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] docs: document use of automatic cleanup


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] docs: document use of automatic cleanup functions in glib
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 09:46:51 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0

On 8/29/19 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Document the use of g_autofree and g_autoptr in glib for automatic
> freeing of memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <address@hidden>
> ---
>  CODING_STYLE.rst | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/CODING_STYLE.rst b/CODING_STYLE.rst
> index 4501d87352..39397f0f6f 100644
> --- a/CODING_STYLE.rst
> +++ b/CODING_STYLE.rst
> @@ -441,6 +441,91 @@ In addition, QEMU assumes that the compiler does not use 
> the latitude
>  given in C99 and C11 to treat aspects of signed '<<' as undefined, as
>  documented in the GNU Compiler Collection manual starting at version 4.0.
>  
> +Automatic memory deallocation
> +=============================
> +
> +QEMU has a mandatory dependency either the GCC or CLang compiler. As

s/either/on either/

> +such it has the freedom to make use of a C language extension for
> +automatically running a cleanup function when a stack variable goes
> +out of scope. This can be used to simplify function cleanup paths,
> +often allowing many goto jumps to be eliminated, through automatic
> +free'ing of memory.
> +

> +
> +For example, instead of
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +    int somefunc(void) {

Should that { be on its own line to match our prevailing style?

> +        int ret = -1;
> +        char *foo = g_strdup_printf("foo%", "wibble");
> +        GList *bar = .....
> +
> +        if (eek) {
> +           goto cleanup;
> +        }
> +
> +        ret = 0;
> +
> +      cleanup:
> +        g_free(foo);
> +        g_list_free(bar);
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +Using g_autofree/g_autoptr enables the code to be written as:
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +    int somefunc(void) {

here too

> +        g_autofree char *foo = g_strdup_printf("foo%", "wibble");
> +        g_autoptr (GList) bar = .....
> +
> +        if (eek) {
> +           return -1;
> +        }
> +
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +
> +While this generally results in simpler, less leak-prone code, there
> +are still some caveats to beware of
> +
> +* Variables declared with g_auto* MUST always be initialized,
> +  otherwise the cleanup function will use uninitialized stack memory
> +
> +* If a variable declared with g_auto* holds a value which must
> +  live beyond the life of the function, that value must be saved
> +  and the original variable NULL'd out. This can be simpler using
> +  g_steal_pointer
> +
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +    char *somefunc(void) {

and again

> +        g_autofree char *foo = g_strdup_printf("foo%", "wibble");
> +        g_autoptr (GList) bar = .....
> +
> +        if (eek) {
> +           return NULL;
> +        }
> +
> +        return g_steal_pointer(&foo);
> +    }
> +
> +
>  Error handling and reporting
>  ============================
>  
> 

With those fixes,
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]