|
From: | Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [EXTERNAL]Re: Proposal for amending TCG interface naming scheme |
Date: | Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:29:06 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 |
On 8/20/19 6:21 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote: >On 8/20/19 5:37 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: >> What if we use the AArch64 mnemonics: zxt (zero-extend) and sxt >> (sign-extend)? >> This would give us >> >> tcg_gen_zxt8_i32 >> tcg_gen_sxt8_i32 >> (etc) >> tcg_gen_zxt_i32_i64 >> tcg_gen_sxt_i32_i64 > > Again this might look familiar to those knowing AArch64 but not to > someone who does not know that. Maybe zext sext is a bit more decypherable. Both namings seems acceptable. Not sure if the lexicographic distance is reduced, neither if reducing it would make a difference :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |