qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH-for-4.1? 7/7] spapr_events: Rewri


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH-for-4.1? 7/7] spapr_events: Rewrite a fall through comment
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:59:17 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0

Le 19/07/2019 à 15:14, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
> GCC9 is confused by this comment when building with CFLAG
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2:
> 
>     CC      ppc64-softmmu/hw/ppc/spapr_rtc.o
>   hw/ppc/spapr_events.c: In function ‘rtas_event_log_to_source’:
>   hw/ppc/spapr_events.c:312:12: error: this statement may fall through 
> [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
>     312 |         if (spapr_ovec_test(spapr->ov5_cas, OV5_HP_EVT)) {
>         |            ^
>   hw/ppc/spapr_events.c:317:5: note: here
>     317 |     case RTAS_LOG_TYPE_EPOW:
>         |     ^~~~
>   cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Rewrite the comment using 'fall through' which is recognized by
> GCC and static analyzers.
> 
> Reported-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_events.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> index ae0f093f59..0a98894ad6 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ rtas_event_log_to_source(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int 
> log_type)
>              g_assert(source->enabled);
>              break;
>          }
> -        /* fall back to epow for legacy hotplug interrupt source */
> +        /* fall through back to epow for legacy hotplug interrupt source */
>      case RTAS_LOG_TYPE_EPOW:
>          source = spapr_event_sources_get_source(spapr->event_sources,
>                                                  EVENT_CLASS_EPOW);
> 

Applied to my trivial-patches branch.

Thanks,
Laurent



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]