Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 5/9] s390x/mmu: Implement access-exception-fetch/store-indication facility

[Thomas Huth]

On 8/19/19 2:16 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 8/5/19 5:29 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> We always have to indicate whether it is a fetch or a store for all access
>> exceptions. This is only missing for LAP exceptions.
> 
> Do we really need this for LAP, too? If I get figure 3-5 "Enhanced
> Suppression-on-Protection Results" right, these bits are not set for LAP
> exceptions...? Do I miss something?

I was looking at an older version of the PoP ... the table that I mean
is "Figure 3-8. Enhanced Suppression-on-Protection Facility 2 Results"
in SA22-7832-11.

 Thomas