qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-4.2 v2 5/5] target/riscv: Fix Floating Point reg


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-4.2 v2 5/5] target/riscv: Fix Floating Point register names
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:06:58 -0700

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:08 PM Palmer Dabbelt <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:35:34 PDT (-0700), Alistair Francis wrote:
> > From: Atish Patra <address@hidden>
> >
> > As per the RISC-V spec, Floating Point registers are named as f0..f31
> > so lets fix the register names accordingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  target/riscv/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > index f8d07bd20a..af1e9b7690 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > @@ -40,10 +40,10 @@ const char * const riscv_int_regnames[] = {
> >  };
> >
> >  const char * const riscv_fpr_regnames[] = {
> > -  "ft0", "ft1", "ft2",  "ft3",  "ft4", "ft5", "ft6",  "ft7",
> > -  "fs0", "fs1", "fa0",  "fa1",  "fa2", "fa3", "fa4",  "fa5",
> > -  "fa6", "fa7", "fs2",  "fs3",  "fs4", "fs5", "fs6",  "fs7",
> > -  "fs8", "fs9", "fs10", "fs11", "ft8", "ft9", "ft10", "ft11"
> > +  "f0", "f1", "f2",  "f3",  "f4", "f5", "f6", "f7",
> > +  "f8", "f9", "f10",  "f11",  "f12", "f13", "f14", "f15",
> > +  "f16", "f17", "f18",  "f19",  "f20", "f21", "f22", "f23",
> > +  "f24", "f25", "f26", "f27", "f28", "f29", "f30", "f31"
> >  };
> >
> >  const char * const riscv_excp_names[] = {
>
> I actually don't think this one is right: riscv_int_regnames uses the ABI
> names, so this should match.  I'd be OK switching both of them, but not just
> one.

I like that the int registers use the ABI names though, as I find that useful.

What about we change the registers to use both? As in something like
x0/zero for all registers?

The disadvantage is that it's a little longer, but it seems the most useful.

Alistair

>
> I've queued the other four patches.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]