[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1838228] Re: Slirp Broadcast traffic
From: |
Chris Koch |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1838228] Re: Slirp Broadcast traffic |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:16:15 -0000 |
Thanks. Opened https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/slirp/libslirp/issues/9.
** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/slirp/libslirp/issues #9
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/slirp/libslirp/issues/9
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838228
Title:
Slirp Broadcast traffic
Status in QEMU:
New
Bug description:
Hi all,
Version: QEMU emulator version 3.1.0 (Debian 1:3.1+dfsg-7+build1)
I'm running some DHCP traffic to a *custom* DHCP server with user-mode
networking in QEMU. I'm using port 30067 for the server, so this does
not conflict with the built-in DHCP server.
DHCP broadcasts to and from the server, and I'm observing issues with
both sending and receiving packets.
Firstly, from the VM, a packet sent to IPv4 x.x.x.2:30067 (gateway)
makes it to the server, but a packet sent to 255.255.255.255 does not.
I'd suspect that Slirp has to support sending to the broadcast IP
address? Or is this something I can turn on with a configuration
option? (My QEMU version too old?)
Secondly, the source address in a DHCP IPv4 packet must be 0.0.0.0 (by
RFC). That means that any return packet will have 0.0.0.0 swapped in
as its destination address. However, that packet doesn't make it into
the VM at all. I know that if you deliver this packet to Linux, a raw
socket will spit it back out. The packets' destination address should
not prevent the packet from being delivered to the right VM, since
Slirp (should?) know exactly which VM the session belongs to. (It's a
proxy, not a router.)
WDYT? Did I miss some configuration options or use too old a version?
Thanks,
Chris
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1838228/+subscriptions