qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Use of TARGET_FMT_plx in hw/tpm/trace-events


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Use of TARGET_FMT_plx in hw/tpm/trace-events
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 09:22:44 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2

On 20/07/2019 11.42, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/20/19 8:39 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Consider hw/tpm/trace-events
>>
>>     # tpm_crb.c
>>     tpm_crb_mmio_read(uint64_t addr, unsigned size, uint32_t val) "CRB read 
>> 0x" TARGET_FMT_plx " len:%u val: 0x%" PRIx32
>>     tpm_crb_mmio_write(uint64_t addr, unsigned size, uint32_t val) "CRB 
>> write 0x" TARGET_FMT_plx " len:%u val: 0x%" PRIx32
>>
>> Format is TARGET_FMT_plx formats a hwaddr, but the parameter type is
>> uint64_t.  They happen to be the same.  Is this kosher?
>>
> 
> Missed when converting from DPRINTF() to trace-events:
> https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=ec427498;hp=8cb340c613
> 
> PRIx64 certainly makes sense here.
> 
> Since it is the single use, once updated we can remote this hunk from
> scripts/tracetool/format/log_stap.py:
> 
>     if macro == "TARGET_FMT_plx":
>         return "%016x"
> 
> I guess remember a thread with Thomas talking about TARGET_FMT_plx but I
> can't find it, maybe I dreamed about it...

That was:

 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10930327/

... I think we should rename it to HWADDR_PRI0x or so.

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]