Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: just pass RAMBlock is enough

[Wei Yang]

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:17:19AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>On 18/07/19 03:25, Wei Yang wrote:
>> RAMBlock->used_length is always passed to migration_bitmap_sync_range(),
>> which could be retrieved from RAMBlock.
>> 
>> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  migration/ram.c | 9 ++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
>> index 908517fc2b..0a6070d787 100644
>> --- a/migration/ram.c
>> +++ b/migration/ram.c
>> @@ -1669,11 +1669,10 @@ static inline bool 
>> migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(RAMState *rs,
>>      return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void migration_bitmap_sync_range(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb,
>> -                                        ram_addr_t length)
>> +static void migration_bitmap_sync_range(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb)
>>  {
>>      rs->migration_dirty_pages +=
>> -        cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, 0, length,
>> +        cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, 0, rb->used_length,
>>                                                &rs->num_dirty_pages_period);
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -1762,7 +1761,7 @@ static void migration_bitmap_sync(RAMState *rs)
>>      qemu_mutex_lock(&rs->bitmap_mutex);
>>      rcu_read_lock();
>>      RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) {
>> -        migration_bitmap_sync_range(rs, block, block->used_length);
>> +        migration_bitmap_sync_range(rs, block);
>>      }
>>      ram_counters.remaining = ram_bytes_remaining();
>>      rcu_read_unlock();
>> @@ -4193,7 +4192,7 @@ static void colo_flush_ram_cache(void)
>>      memory_global_dirty_log_sync();
>>      rcu_read_lock();
>>      RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) {
>> -        migration_bitmap_sync_range(ram_state, block, block->used_length);
>> +        migration_bitmap_sync_range(ram_state, block);
>>      }
>>      rcu_read_unlock();
>>  
>> 
>
>Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
>
>and in fact we can rename the function to ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap.

Sounds reasonable. Let me improve it.

>
>Paolo

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me