[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some mo
From: |
Max Reitz |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jul 2019 17:58:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 |
On 16.07.19 17:56, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 7/16/19 10:44 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 16.07.19 17:31, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 16/07/2019 17.26, Max Reitz wrote:
>>>> On 16.07.19 14:28, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>>> Remove some more tests from the "auto" group that either have issues
>>>>> in certain environments (like macOS or FreeBSD, or on certain file systems
>>>>> like ZFS or tmpfs), do not work with the qcow2 format, or that are simply
>>>>> taking too much time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> tests/qemu-iotests/group | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> I just looked through the list to see whether any of the test seems like
>>>> we’d want to keep it even though it is a bit slow. Mostly I was looking
>>>> for tests that cover complex cases.
>>>>
>>>> 255 is the only one that seemed to fit that bill to me. So why do you
>>>> remove it? Is it because it takes two seconds?
>>>
>>> No, I removed it because it was failing on macOS:
>>>
>>> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4860239294234624
>>>
>>> ("OSError: AF_UNIX path too long" is the error, if I got that right)
>>
>> Ah, OK. So, uh, we effectively can’t run any Python tests on macOS?
>
> Not when our CI is set up to use super-long file names:
>
> + File
> "/private/var/folders/sy/2x5qvs0n4lg18fry9jz4y21m0000gn/T/cirrus-ci-build/tests/qemu-iotests/../../python/qemu/machine.py",
> line 294, in launch
That isn’t really long.
> Is there any way to create our sockets somewhere under /tmp instead of
> inside tests/qemu-iotests, so that we have a shorter filename for
> sockets no matter how deep in the file hierarchy the tests themselves live?
>
> Also, at one point, we tossed around the idea of
> s/qemu-iotests/iotests/, to shave off 5 characters that don't really add
> anything.
I’d personally rather just skip the iotests if we detect such a silly
OS, but maybe that’s just me.
Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable iotests during "make check", Thomas Huth, 2019/07/16
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] tests/qemu-iotests/check: Allow tests without groups, Thomas Huth, 2019/07/16
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group, Thomas Huth, 2019/07/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group, Max Reitz, 2019/07/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group, Thomas Huth, 2019/07/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group, Max Reitz, 2019/07/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group, Max Reitz, 2019/07/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group, Eric Blake, 2019/07/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group,
Max Reitz <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group, Eric Blake, 2019/07/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group, Max Reitz, 2019/07/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group, Thomas Huth, 2019/07/18
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] gitlab-ci: Remove qcow2 tests that are handled by "make check" already, Thomas Huth, 2019/07/16
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] tests: Run the iotests during "make check" again, Thomas Huth, 2019/07/16