qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390: support EDAT-2 in mmu_translate_region


From: Christian Borntraeger
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390: support EDAT-2 in mmu_translate_region
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:11:04 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2

On 16.07.19 15:04, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:52:03 +0200
> Ilya Leoshkevich <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>>> Am 16.07.2019 um 14:41 schrieb David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> How urgent is this? If this can wait, I can polish and send my series I 
>>> have here
>>> instead, which also implents
>>> - IEP support
>>> - access-exception-fetch/store-indication facility
>>> - ESOP-1, ESOP-2  
>>
>> This is not urgent, I can live with my patch for now.
>> It’s good to know that proper EDAT-2 support is being worked on.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Ilya
> 
> Ok, so I will not queue this patch right now (I assume you're fine with
> keeping this locally for now?), but wait for David's series for 4.2.
> 
> Sounds reasonable?

While not complete, Ilyas  patch clearly improves the situation (and it is 
pretty
similar to the EDAT-1 support). 
I think the question is: are there other instruction that we emulate in qemu 
via the
page table walker even for KVM? I believe we always go via the kvm memory ioctl 
for
page table  access via instructions so the patch is not critical for KVM. So 
unless
we have something I think Connys proposal is reasonable.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]