[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390: support EDAT-2 in mmu_translate_region
From: |
Christian Borntraeger |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390: support EDAT-2 in mmu_translate_region |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:11:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 |
On 16.07.19 15:04, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:52:03 +0200
> Ilya Leoshkevich <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> Am 16.07.2019 um 14:41 schrieb David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> How urgent is this? If this can wait, I can polish and send my series I
>>> have here
>>> instead, which also implents
>>> - IEP support
>>> - access-exception-fetch/store-indication facility
>>> - ESOP-1, ESOP-2
>>
>> This is not urgent, I can live with my patch for now.
>> It’s good to know that proper EDAT-2 support is being worked on.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Ilya
>
> Ok, so I will not queue this patch right now (I assume you're fine with
> keeping this locally for now?), but wait for David's series for 4.2.
>
> Sounds reasonable?
While not complete, Ilyas patch clearly improves the situation (and it is
pretty
similar to the EDAT-1 support).
I think the question is: are there other instruction that we emulate in qemu
via the
page table walker even for KVM? I believe we always go via the kvm memory ioctl
for
page table access via instructions so the patch is not critical for KVM. So
unless
we have something I think Connys proposal is reasonable.