[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/9] block: Delay poll when ending drained se

From: Max Reitz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/9] block: Delay poll when ending drained sections
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:24:09 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2

Ping – as this series fixes an abort and a segfault, I would appreciate

(Head over to “Fixes for concurrent block jobs” for even more fixes for
aborts and segfaults.)

On 19.06.19 17:25, Max Reitz wrote:
> Hi,
> This is v2 to “block: Keep track of parent quiescing”.
> Please read this cover letter, because I’m very unsure about the design
> in this series and I’d appreciate some comments.
> As Kevin wrote in his reply to that series, the actual problem is that
> bdrv_drain_invoke() polls on every node whenever ending a drain.  This
> may cause graph changes, which is actually forbidden.
> To solve that problem, this series makes the drain code construct a list
> of undrain operations that have been initiated, and then polls all of
> them on the root level once graph changes are acceptable.
> Note that I don’t like this list concept very much, so I’m open to
> alternatives.
> Furthermore, all BdrvChildRoles with BDS parents have a broken
> .drained_end() implementation.  The documentation clearly states that
> this function is not allowed to poll, but it does.  So this series
> changes it to a variant (using the new code) that does not poll.
> There is a catch, which may actually be a problem, I don’t know: The new
> variant of that .drained_end() does not poll at all, never.  As
> described above, now every bdrv_drain_invoke() returns an object that
> describes when it will be done and which can thus be polled for.  These
> objects are just discarded when using BdrvChildRole.drained_end().  That
> does not feel quite right.  It would probably be more correct to let
> BdrvChildRole.drained_end() return these objects so the top level
> bdrv_drained_end() can poll for their completion.
> I decided not to do this, for two reasons:
> (1) Doing so would spill the “list of objects to poll for” design to
>     places outside of block/io.c.  I don’t like the design very much as
>     it is, but I can live with it as long as it’s constrained to the
>     core drain code in block/io.c.
>     This is made worse by the fact that currently, those objects are of
>     type BdrvCoDrainData.  But it shouldn’t be a problem to add a new
>     type that is externally visible (we only need the AioContext and
>     whether bdrv_drain_invoke_entry() is done).
> (2) It seems to work as it is.
> The alternative would be to add the same GSList ** parameter to
> BdrvChildRole.drained_end() that I added in the core drain code in patch
> 2, and then let the .drained_end() implementation fill that with objects
> to poll for.  (Which would be accomplished by adding a frontend to
> bdrv_do_drained_end() that lets bdrv_child_cb_drained_poll() pass the
> parameter through.)
> Opinions?
> And then we have bdrv_replace_child_noperm(), which actually wants a
> polling BdrvChildRole.drained_end().  So this series adds
> BdrvChildRole.drained_end_unquiesce(), which takes that role (if there
> is any polling to do).
> Note that if I implemented the alternative described above
> (.drained_end() gets said GSList ** parameter), a
> .drained_end_unquiesce() wouldn’t be necessary.
> bdrv_parent_drained_end_single() could just poll the list returned by
> .drained_end() by itself.
> Finally, patches 1, 8, and 9 are unmodified from v1.
> git backport-diff against v1:
> Key:
> [----] : patches are identical
> [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch
> [down] : patch is downstream-only
> The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, 
> respectively
> 001/9:[----] [--] 'block: Introduce BdrvChild.parent_quiesce_counter'
> 002/9:[down] 'block: Add @data_objs to bdrv_drain_invoke()'
> 003/9:[down] 'block: Add bdrv_poll_drain_data_objs()'
> 004/9:[down] 'block: Move polling out of bdrv_drain_invoke()'
> 005/9:[down] 'block: Add @poll to bdrv_parent_drained_end_single()'
> 006/9:[down] 'block: Add bdrv_drained_end_no_poll()'
> 007/9:[down] 'block: Fix BDS children's .drained_end()'
> 008/9:[----] [--] 'iotests: Add @has_quit to vm.shutdown()'
> 009/9:[----] [--] 'iotests: Test commit with a filter on the chain'
> Max Reitz (9):
>   block: Introduce BdrvChild.parent_quiesce_counter
>   block: Add @data_objs to bdrv_drain_invoke()
>   block: Add bdrv_poll_drain_data_objs()
>   block: Move polling out of bdrv_drain_invoke()
>   block: Add @poll to bdrv_parent_drained_end_single()
>   block: Add bdrv_drained_end_no_poll()
>   block: Fix BDS children's .drained_end()
>   iotests: Add @has_quit to vm.shutdown()
>   iotests: Test commit with a filter on the chain
>  include/block/block.h      |  22 +++++-
>  include/block/block_int.h  |  23 ++++++
>  block.c                    |  24 +++---
>  block/io.c                 | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  python/qemu/__init__.py    |   5 +-
>  tests/qemu-iotests/040     |  40 +++++++++-
>  tests/qemu-iotests/040.out |   4 +-
>  tests/qemu-iotests/255     |   2 +-
>  8 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]