qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] net/colo-compare.c: Fix memory leak and code


From: Jason Wang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] net/colo-compare.c: Fix memory leak and code style issue.
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:17:57 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2


On 2019/7/10 下午3:50, Zhang, Chen wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Wang [mailto:address@hidden]
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 10:48 PM
To: Zhang, Chen <address@hidden>; Li Zhijian <address@hidden>;
Peter Maydell <address@hidden>; qemu-dev <qemu-
address@hidden>
Cc: Zhang Chen <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] net/colo-compare.c: Fix memory leak
and code style issue.


On 2019/7/4 下午4:36, Zhang Chen wrote:
From: Zhang Chen <address@hidden>

This patch to fix the origin "char *data" menory leak, code style
issue and add necessary check here.
Reported-by: Coverity (CID 1402785)

Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <address@hidden>
---
   net/colo-compare.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c index
909dd6c6eb..ed349f5f6a 100644
--- a/net/colo-compare.c
+++ b/net/colo-compare.c
@@ -127,6 +127,17 @@ static int compare_chr_send(CompareState *s,
                               uint32_t vnet_hdr_len,
                               bool notify_remote_frame);

+static bool packet_matches_str(const char *str,
+                               uint8_t *buf,
+                               uint32_t packet_len) {
+    if (packet_len <= strlen(str)) {
+        return false;
+    }
+
+    return !memcmp(str, buf, strlen(str) + 1);

This assumes buf is NULL terminated (you pass notify_rs->buf) which is not
correct I think?
Yes, you are right.
How about this:

static bool packet_matches_str(const char *str,
                                uint8_t *buf,
                                uint32_t packet_len) {
     if (packet_len != strlen(str) || !buf) {
         return false;
     }


When can we hit !buf?

Thanks



     return !memcmp(str, buf, strlen(str));
}

Thanks
Zhang Chen


Thanks


+}
+
   static void notify_remote_frame(CompareState *s)
   {
       char msg[] = "DO_CHECKPOINT";
@@ -1008,21 +1019,24 @@ static void
compare_notify_rs_finalize(SocketReadState *notify_rs)
   {
       CompareState *s = container_of(notify_rs, CompareState,
notify_rs);

-    /* Get Xen colo-frame's notify and handle the message */
-    char *data = g_memdup(notify_rs->buf, notify_rs->packet_len);
-    char msg[] = "COLO_COMPARE_GET_XEN_INIT";
+    const char msg[] = "COLO_COMPARE_GET_XEN_INIT";
       int ret;

-    if (!strcmp(data, "COLO_USERSPACE_PROXY_INIT")) {
+    if (packet_matches_str("COLO_USERSPACE_PROXY_INIT",
+                           notify_rs->buf,
+                           notify_rs->packet_len)) {
           ret = compare_chr_send(s, (uint8_t *)msg, strlen(msg), 0, true);
           if (ret < 0) {
               error_report("Notify Xen COLO-frame INIT failed");
           }
-    }
-
-    if (!strcmp(data, "COLO_CHECKPOINT")) {
+    } else if (packet_matches_str("COLO_CHECKPOINT",
+                                  notify_rs->buf,
+                                  notify_rs->packet_len)) {
           /* colo-compare do checkpoint, flush pri packet and remove sec packet
*/
           g_queue_foreach(&s->conn_list, colo_flush_packets, s);
+    } else {
+        error_report("COLO compare got unsupported instruction '%s'",
+                     (char *)notify_rs->buf);
       }
   }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]