qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/7] iotests: amend QEMU NBD process synchron


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/7] iotests: amend QEMU NBD process synchronization
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:59:53 +0000

11.06.2019 21:02, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
> Processes are dying harder under the Valgring. It results in counting
> the dying process as a newborn one. Make it sure that old NBD job get
> finished before starting a new one.
> 
> Suggested-by: Roman Kagan <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <address@hidden>
> ---
>   tests/qemu-iotests/common.nbd | 6 ++++++
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/common.nbd b/tests/qemu-iotests/common.nbd
> index 25fc9ff..e3dcc60 100644
> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/common.nbd
> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/common.nbd
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>   nbd_unix_socket="${TEST_DIR}/qemu-nbd.sock"
>   nbd_tcp_addr="127.0.0.1"
>   nbd_pid_file="${TEST_DIR}/qemu-nbd.pid"
> +nbd_job_pid=""
>   
>   nbd_server_stop()
>   {
> @@ -33,6 +34,9 @@ nbd_server_stop()
>               kill "$NBD_PID"
>           fi
>       fi

Honestly, I don't understand the problem from commit message, but anyway comment
should be added here, to mark that this is for valgrind... But you don't check 
for
VALGRIND enabled.. I it intentional?

> +    if [ -n "$nbd_job_pid" ] && kill -s 0 "$nbd_job_pid" 2>/dev/null; then
> +        wait "$nbd_job_pid"
> +    fi
>       rm -f "$nbd_unix_socket"
>   }
>   
> @@ -61,6 +65,7 @@ nbd_server_start_unix_socket()
>   {
>       nbd_server_stop
>       $QEMU_NBD -v -t -k "$nbd_unix_socket" "$@" &
> +    nbd_job_pid=$!
>       nbd_server_wait_for_unix_socket $!
>   }
>   
> @@ -105,5 +110,6 @@ nbd_server_start_tcp_socket()
>   {
>       nbd_server_stop
>       $QEMU_NBD -v -t -b $nbd_tcp_addr -p $nbd_tcp_port "$@" &
> +    nbd_job_pid=$!
>       nbd_server_wait_for_tcp_socket $!
>   }
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]