qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 17/23] s390x/tcg: Implement VECTOR FP PERFORM


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 17/23] s390x/tcg: Implement VECTOR FP PERFORM SIGN OPERATION
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 20:05:51 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 31.05.19 19:48, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 5/31/19 5:44 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> +static DisasJumpType op_vfpso(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
>> +{
>> +    const uint8_t fpf = get_field(s->fields, m3);
>> +    const uint8_t m4 = get_field(s->fields, m4);
>> +    const uint8_t m5 = get_field(s->fields, m5);
>> +    const bool se = extract32(m4, 3, 1);
>> +    TCGv_i64 tmp;
>> +    int i;
>> +
>> +    if (fpf != FPF_LONG || extract32(m4, 0, 3) || m5 > 2) {
>> +        gen_program_exception(s, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
>> +        return DISAS_NORETURN;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    tmp = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>> +    for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>> +        read_vec_element_i64(tmp, get_field(s->fields, v2), i, ES_64);
>> +
>> +        switch (m5) {
>> +        case 0:
>> +            /* sign bit is inverted (complement) */
>> +            tcg_gen_xori_i64(tmp, tmp, 1ull << 63);
>> +            break;
>> +        case 1:
>> +            /* sign bit is set to one (negative) */
>> +            tcg_gen_ori_i64(tmp, tmp, 1ull << 63);
>> +            break;
>> +        case 2:
>> +            /* sign bit is set to zero (positive) */
>> +            tcg_gen_andi_i64(tmp, tmp, (1ull << 63) - 1);
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        write_vec_element_i64(tmp, get_field(s->fields, v1), i, ES_64);
>> +        if (se) {
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +    tcg_temp_free_i64(tmp);
>> +    return DISAS_NEXT;
>> +}
> 
> Better to use tcg_gen_gvec_{and,xor,or}i to do all of the elements at once.
> Won't work for FPF_EXTENDED, but much better for FPF_SINGLE, once they're
> supported.
> 

How could I miss that :)

Thanks!


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]