qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] net/virtio: add failover support


From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] net/virtio: add failover support
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 20:09:46 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)

* Jens Freimann (address@hidden) wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> sorry for the  delayed reply.
> 
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:04:15AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:45:05AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Jens Freimann (address@hidden) wrote:
> > > > +static void virtio_net_primary_plug_timer(void *opaque);
> > > > +
> > > >  static void virtio_net_set_link_status(NetClientState *nc)
> > > >  {
> > > >      VirtIONet *n = qemu_get_nic_opaque(nc);
> > > > @@ -786,6 +796,14 @@ static void virtio_net_set_features(VirtIODevice 
> > > > *vdev, uint64_t features)
> > > >      } else {
> > > >          memset(n->vlans, 0xff, MAX_VLAN >> 3);
> > > >      }
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (virtio_has_feature(features, VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY)) {
> > > > +        atomic_set(&n->primary_should_be_hidden, false);
> > > > +        if (n->primary_device_timer)
> > > > +            timer_mod(n->primary_device_timer,
> > > > +                qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) +
> > > > +                4000);
> > > > +    }
> > > 
> > > What's this magic timer constant and why?
> 
> To be honest it's a leftover from previous versions (before I took
> over) of the patches and I'm not sure why the timer is there.
> I removed it and so far see no reason to keep it.
> 
> > > 
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static int virtio_net_handle_rx_mode(VirtIONet *n, uint8_t cmd,
> > > > @@ -2626,6 +2644,87 @@ void virtio_net_set_netclient_name(VirtIONet *n, 
> > > > const char *name,
> > > >      n->netclient_type = g_strdup(type);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +static void virtio_net_primary_plug_timer(void *opaque)
> > > > +{
> > > > +    VirtIONet *n = opaque;
> > > > +    Error *err = NULL;
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (n->primary_device_dict)
> > > > +        n->primary_device_opts = 
> > > > qemu_opts_from_qdict(qemu_find_opts("device"),
> > > > +            n->primary_device_dict, &err);
> > > > +    if (n->primary_device_opts) {
> > > > +        n->primary_dev = qdev_device_add(n->primary_device_opts, &err);
> > > > +        error_setg(&err, "virtio_net: couldn't plug in primary 
> > > > device");
> > > > +        return;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +    if (!n->primary_device_dict && err) {
> > > > +        if (n->primary_device_timer) {
> > > > +            timer_mod(n->primary_device_timer,
> > > > +                qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) +
> > > > +                100);
> > > 
> > > same here.
> 
> see above
> 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > +        }
> > > > +    }
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void virtio_net_handle_migration_primary(VirtIONet *n,
> > > > +                                                MigrationState *s)
> > > > +{
> > > > +    Error *err = NULL;
> > > > +    bool should_be_hidden = atomic_read(&n->primary_should_be_hidden);
> > > > +
> > > > +    n->primary_dev = qdev_find_recursive(sysbus_get_default(),
> > > > +            n->primary_device_id);
> > > > +    if (!n->primary_dev) {
> > > > +        error_setg(&err, "virtio_net: couldn't find primary device");
> > > 
> > > There's something broken with the error handling in this function - the
> > > 'err' never goes anywhere - I don't think it ever gets printed or
> > > reported or stops the migration.
> 
> yes, I'll fix it.
> 
> > > > +    }
> > > > +    if (migration_in_setup(s) && !should_be_hidden && n->primary_dev) {
> > > > +        qdev_unplug(n->primary_dev, &err);
> > > 
> > > Not knowing unplug well; can you just explain - is that device hard
> > > unplugged and it's gone by the time this function returns or is it still
> > > hanging around for some indeterminate time?
> 
> Qemu will trigger an unplug request via pcie attention button in which case
> there could be a delay by the guest operating system. We could give it some
> amount of time and if nothing happens try surpise removal or handle the
> error otherwise.

OK, can you show how one of those is going to work and try it out.
THis setup is weird enough I just want to make sure it works.

Dave

> 
> regards,
> Jens
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]