qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/10] s390x/cpumodel: disable csske and bpb


From: Christian Borntraeger
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/10] s390x/cpumodel: disable csske and bpb from gen15 cpu models onwards
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:18:49 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1


On 26.04.19 13:18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.04.19 13:10, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> These facilities are deprecated and no longer needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target/s390x/gen-features.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>> index 6260f56dc1..c346b76bdf 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>  
>>  #include <inttypes.h>
>>  #include <stdio.h>
>> +#include <string.h>
>>  #include "cpu_features_def.h"
>>  
>>  #define ARRAY_SIZE(array) (sizeof(array) / sizeof(array[0]))
>> @@ -833,6 +834,11 @@ static void set_bits(uint64_t list[], BitSpec bits)
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline void clear_bit(uint64_t list[], unsigned long nr)
>> +{
>> +    list[nr / 64] &= ~(1ULL << (nr % 64));
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void print_feature_defs(void)
>>  {
>>      uint64_t base_feat[S390_FEAT_MAX / 64 + 1] = {};
>> @@ -843,6 +849,12 @@ static void print_feature_defs(void)
>>      printf("\n/* CPU model feature list data */\n");
>>  
>>      for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(CpuFeatDef); i++) {
>> +        /* With gen15 CSSKE and BPB are deprecated */
>> +        if (strcmp(CpuFeatDef[i].name, "S390_FEAT_LIST_GEN15_GA1") == 0) {
>> +            clear_bit(base_feat, S390_FEAT_CONDITIONAL_SSKE);
>> +            clear_bit(default_feat, S390_FEAT_CONDITIONAL_SSKE);
>> +            clear_bit(default_feat, S390_FEAT_BPB);
>> +        }
>>          set_bits(base_feat, CpuFeatDef[i].base_bits);
>>          /* add the base to the default features */
>>          set_bits(default_feat, CpuFeatDef[i].base_bits);
>>
> 
> Can you squash that into the previous patch, so it doesn't look like the
> case model is suddenly changed?

can do. I wanted it to be separate for better review.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]