Re: [Qemu-devel] curses.c: "We need a terminal output" ?

[Joachim Durchholz]

Sorry, I'm done having to argue against(!) a person who's stonewalling 
me by wilfully ignoring differences ("doesn't work perfectly" 
interpreted as "does not work at all"), discounting 
just-for-testing-purpose workarounds as if they were actual proposed 
solutions ("not a sane approach"), ignoring the use case (still 
insisting on terminal size mutability), and proposing a nonworking 
solution (-nographic does not give me any output, of course because it 
doesn't have a terminal to talk to).

Reminds me of discussions in the Maven group, there, anything that 
didn't fit their shiny predefined ideas was brushed off in a similar manner.
Choosing the same solution: Use a different workaround, chalk this up 
under the Passive-Aggressive Unhelpfulness Encountered column.

No hard feelings towards the community.

Have a nice day everyone.
Jo

P.S.: Frustrated. In two ways.
Latin "frustra" = "in vain".

P.P.S.: I will stick around a bit so I can answer to questions based on 
genuine interest, but I'll disconnect from the list after that.

P.P.P.S.: No hard feelings towards the community in general. In fact, 
thanks to those two who tried to help.