qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/13] imx25-pdk: create ds1338 for qtest inside


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/13] imx25-pdk: create ds1338 for qtest inside the test
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 11:54:34 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 18/03/2019 18.15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> There is no need to have a test device created by the board.
> Instead, create it in the qtest so that we will be able to run
> it on other boards too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/arm/imx25_pdk.c  | 9 ---------
>  tests/ds1338-test.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/imx25_pdk.c b/hw/arm/imx25_pdk.c
> index 9f3ee14739..65e1768663 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/imx25_pdk.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/imx25_pdk.c
> @@ -132,15 +132,6 @@ static void imx25_pdk_init(MachineState *machine)
>       */
>      if (!qtest_enabled()) {
>          arm_load_kernel(&s->soc.cpu, &imx25_pdk_binfo);
> -    } else {
> -        /*
> -         * This I2C device doesn't exist on the real board.
> -         * We add it here (only on qtest usage) to be able to do a bit
> -         * of simple qtest. See "make check" for details.
> -         */
> -        i2c_create_slave((I2CBus *)qdev_get_child_bus(DEVICE(&s->soc.i2c[0]),
> -                                                      "i2c-bus.0"),
> -                         "ds1338", 0x68);
>      }
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/tests/ds1338-test.c b/tests/ds1338-test.c
> index 88f829f241..bd72a159cb 100644
> --- a/tests/ds1338-test.c
> +++ b/tests/ds1338-test.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  
>      g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
>  
> -    s = qtest_start("-display none -machine imx25-pdk");
> +    s = qtest_start("-display none -machine imx25-pdk -device 
> ds1338,address=0x68");
>      i2c = imx_i2c_create(s, IMX25_I2C_0_BASE);
>      addr = DS1338_ADDR;

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]