qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] target/arm: Put system registers in "system


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] target/arm: Put system registers in "system" group
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:44:49 +0000

On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 20:12, Richard Henderson
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> The system group is predefined within gdb.  While the spec
> seems to allow arbitrary group names, that seems to mess up
> the addition of all registers to any groups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/arm/gdbstub.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/gdbstub.c b/target/arm/gdbstub.c
> index 0c64c0292e..67c8874b3b 100644
> --- a/target/arm/gdbstub.c
> +++ b/target/arm/gdbstub.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void arm_gen_one_xml_reg_tag(GString *s, 
> DynamicGDBXMLInfo *dyn_xml,
>  {
>      g_string_append_printf(s, "<reg name=\"%s\"", ri->name);
>      g_string_append_printf(s, " bitsize=\"%d\"", bitsize);
> -    g_string_append_printf(s, " group=\"cp_regs\"/>");
> +    g_string_append_printf(s, " group=\"system\"/>");
>      dyn_xml->num_cpregs++;
>      dyn_xml->cpregs_keys[dyn_xml->num_cpregs - 1] = ri_key;
>  }

I don't intrinsically object to this, but I think we should
get gdb upstream to nail down what they actually expect out
of a debug stub for the register XML and fix any bugs on
their end before we tweak what we're doing.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]