qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] file-posix: Make auto-read-only dynamic


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] file-posix: Make auto-read-only dynamic
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 16:37:49 +0100

We introduced the auto-read-only option to fix the problem that block
jobs that reopen a backing file read-write don't work any more when all
nodes are created individually with -blockdev. The reason is that
bs->file of these backing files doesn't inherit the read-only option
from the format layer node any more if it's created separately.

The way auto-read-only was designed to fix this is that it just always
opens the file node read-write if it can, so reopening the format layer
node is enough to make the backing file writable when necessary.

This works in principle, but not when libvirt uses sVirt: Then QEMU
doesn't even have the permissions to open the image file read-write
until libvirt performs an operation where write access is needed.

This series changes auto-read-only so that it works dynamically and
automatically reopens the file read-only or read-write depending on the
permissions that users attached to the node requested.

See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685989

Kevin Wolf (8):
  tests/virtio-blk-test: Disable auto-read-only
  block: Avoid useless local_err
  block: Make permission changes in reopen less wrong
  file-posix: Factor out raw_reconfigure_getfd()
  file-posix: Store BDRVRawState.reopen_state during reopen
  file-posix: Lock new fd in raw_reopen_prepare()
  file-posix: Prepare permission code for fd switching
  file-posix: Make auto-read-only dynamic

 block.c                    |  39 +++---
 block/file-posix.c         | 243 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 tests/virtio-blk-test.c    |   2 +-
 tests/qemu-iotests/232.out |  12 +-
 4 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]