[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] hw/block: better reporting on pflash bac
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Mar 2019 10:37:19 +0100 |
This is Alex's "[PATCH v5] hw/block: better reporting on pflash
backing file mismatch" with the padding split off into its own patch,
and both resulting patches applied to pflash_cfi02.c. I downgraded it
to RFC for two reasons:
1. I think the padding patches should not be applied. I'll reply to
PATCH 2 to explain why.
2. I left the update of pflash_cfi02.c as separate fixup patches, so
we can easily ignore them while we discuss 1.
v6:
* Split padding into its own patch.
* Delete "It should be padded to a multiple of the flash block size."
comment. Happy to put it back if you can enlighten me about its
purpose.
* Improve both commit messages.
* New fixup patches to pflash_cfi02.c.
Alex Bennée (2):
hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch
hw/block: Pad undersized read-only images with 0xFF
Markus Armbruster (2):
fixup! hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch
fixup! hw/block: Pad undersized read-only images with 0xFF
hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
2.17.2