[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] include/exec/helper-head.h: support "const v
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] include/exec/helper-head.h: support "const void *" in helper calls |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:29:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 |
On 27/02/19 17:10, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 27.02.19 16:36, address@hidden wrote:
>> Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/address@hidden/
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
>> more information:
>>
>> Message-id: address@hidden
>> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] include/exec/helper-head.h: support "const
>> void *" in helper calls
>> Type: series
>>
>> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
>> #!/bin/bash
>> git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0
>> git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
>> git config --local diff.renames True
>> git config --local diff.algorithm histogram
>> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base..
>> === TEST SCRIPT END ===
>>
>> Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
>> From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu
>> * [new tag] patchew/address@hidden -> patchew/address@hidden
>> * [new tag] patchew/address@hidden -> patchew/address@hidden
>> * [new tag] patchew/address@hidden -> patchew/address@hidden
>> Switched to a new branch 'test'
>>
>> === OUTPUT BEGIN ===
>> checkpatch.pl: no revisions returned for revlist '1'
>
> While patchew seems to be broken right now, I wonder why patches are
> tested that are long upstream? Is this some leftover from fixing patchew?
Yes, Patchew is just catching up. :)
Paolo