qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] migration: Add capabilities validation


From: Yury Kotov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] migration: Add capabilities validation
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:58:23 +0300

11.02.2019, 16:30, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <address@hidden>:
> * Yury Kotov (address@hidden) wrote:
>>  Currently we don't check which capabilities set in the source QEMU.
>>  We just expect that the target QEMU has the same enabled capabilities.
>>
>>  Add explicit validation for capabilities to make sure that the target VM
>>  has them too. This is enabled for only new capabilities to keep compatibily.
>
> I'd rather keep the capaiblities on the wire as strings, rather than
> indexes; indexes are too delicate.
>

It seems that strings also have a problem. E.g. when we remove 'x-' prefix from
x-some-capability. But I don't insist.

> I guess we also have to think about what happens when new capabilities
> are added; what happens when we migrate to an older qemu that doesn't
> know about that capability?
> What happens when we migrate to a newer capability which thinks you
> forgot to send that capability across?
>

I thought about such cases:

> what happens when new capabilities are added?
If new capability should be validated, then source will send it, target will
expect it. Otherwise, nothing will happen.

> what happens when we migrate to an older qemu that doesn't
> know about that capability?

Incoming migration will be failed as expected. If old qemu doesn't know the
capability, therefore qemu doesn't support it. In this case, user should disable
the capability on source before migration.

> What happens when we migrate to a newer capability which thinks you
> forgot to send that capability across?

Sorry, I'm not sure that I understood correctly. It seems that it's the same
case as the previous one.

> While we're on capabilities, I think you also need to check if the
> skip-shared is enabled with postcopy; I don't think they'll work
> together.
>

I agree, postcopy and skip-shared shouldn't be enabled together.
Will add a check in v3.

> Dave
>
>>  Signed-off-by: Yury Kotov <address@hidden>
>>  ---
>>   migration/savevm.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 101 insertions(+)
>>
>>  diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c
>>  index 322660438d..9603a38bca 100644
>>  --- a/migration/savevm.c
>>  +++ b/migration/savevm.c
>>  @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
>>   #include "sysemu/replay.h"
>>   #include "qjson.h"
>>   #include "migration/colo.h"
>>  +#include "qemu/bitmap.h"
>>
>>   #ifndef ETH_P_RARP
>>   #define ETH_P_RARP 0x8035
>>  @@ -316,6 +317,8 @@ typedef struct SaveState {
>>       uint32_t len;
>>       const char *name;
>>       uint32_t target_page_bits;
>>  + uint32_t caps_count;
>>  + uint8_t *capabilities;
>>   } SaveState;
>>
>>   static SaveState savevm_state = {
>>  @@ -323,15 +326,51 @@ static SaveState savevm_state = {
>>       .global_section_id = 0,
>>   };
>>
>>  +static bool should_validate_capability(int capability)
>>  +{
>>  + assert(capability >= 0 && capability < MIGRATION_CAPABILITY__MAX);
>>  + /* Validate only new capabilities to keep compatibility. */
>>  + switch (capability) {
>>  + case MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_X_IGNORE_SHARED:
>>  + return true;
>>  + default:
>>  + return false;
>>  + }
>>  +}
>>  +
>>  +static uint32_t get_validatable_capabilities_count(void)
>>  +{
>>  + MigrationState *s = migrate_get_current();
>>  + uint32_t result = 0;
>>  + int i;
>>  + for (i = 0; i < MIGRATION_CAPABILITY__MAX; i++) {
>>  + if (should_validate_capability(i) && s->enabled_capabilities[i]) {
>>  + result++;
>>  + }
>>  + }
>>  + return result;
>>  +}
>>  +
>>   static int configuration_pre_save(void *opaque)
>>   {
>>       SaveState *state = opaque;
>>       const char *current_name = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(current_machine)->name;
>>  + MigrationState *s = migrate_get_current();
>>  + int i, j;
>>
>>       state->len = strlen(current_name);
>>       state->name = current_name;
>>       state->target_page_bits = qemu_target_page_bits();
>>
>>  + state->caps_count = get_validatable_capabilities_count();
>>  + state->capabilities = g_renew(uint8_t, state->capabilities,
>>  + state->caps_count);
>>  + for (i = j = 0; i < MIGRATION_CAPABILITY__MAX; i++) {
>>  + if (should_validate_capability(i) && s->enabled_capabilities[i]) {
>>  + state->capabilities[j++] = i;
>>  + }
>>  + }
>>  +
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>
>>  @@ -347,6 +386,45 @@ static int configuration_pre_load(void *opaque)
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>
>>  +static bool configuration_validate_capabilities(SaveState *state)
>>  +{
>>  + bool ret = true;
>>  + MigrationState *s = migrate_get_current();
>>  + unsigned long *source_caps_bm;
>>  + int i;
>>  +
>>  + source_caps_bm = bitmap_new(MIGRATION_CAPABILITY__MAX);
>>  + for (i = 0; i < state->caps_count; i++) {
>>  + int capability = state->capabilities[i];
>>  + if (capability >= MIGRATION_CAPABILITY__MAX) {
>>  + error_report("Received unknown capability %d", capability);
>>  + ret = false;
>>  + } else {
>>  + set_bit(capability, source_caps_bm);
>>  + }
>>  + }
>>  +
>>  + for (i = 0; i < MIGRATION_CAPABILITY__MAX; i++) {
>>  + bool source_state, target_state;
>>  + if (!should_validate_capability(i)) {
>>  + continue;
>>  + }
>>  + source_state = test_bit(i, source_caps_bm);
>>  + target_state = s->enabled_capabilities[i];
>>  + if (source_state != target_state) {
>>  + error_report("Capability %s is %s, but received capability is %s",
>>  + MigrationCapability_str(i),
>>  + target_state ? "on" : "off",
>>  + source_state ? "on" : "off");
>>  + ret = false;
>>  + /* Don't break here to report all failed capabilities */
>>  + }
>>  + }
>>  +
>>  + g_free(source_caps_bm);
>>  + return ret;
>>  +}
>>  +
>>   static int configuration_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
>>   {
>>       SaveState *state = opaque;
>>  @@ -364,6 +442,10 @@ static int configuration_post_load(void *opaque, int 
>> version_id)
>>           return -EINVAL;
>>       }
>>
>>  + if (!configuration_validate_capabilities(state)) {
>>  + return -EINVAL;
>>  + }
>>  +
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>
>>  @@ -380,6 +462,11 @@ static bool vmstate_target_page_bits_needed(void 
>> *opaque)
>>           > qemu_target_page_bits_min();
>>   }
>>
>>  +static bool vmstate_capabilites_needed(void *opaque)
>>  +{
>>  + return get_validatable_capabilities_count() > 0;
>>  +}
>>  +
>>   static const VMStateDescription vmstate_target_page_bits = {
>>       .name = "configuration/target-page-bits",
>>       .version_id = 1,
>>  @@ -391,6 +478,19 @@ static const VMStateDescription 
>> vmstate_target_page_bits = {
>>       }
>>   };
>>
>>  +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_capabilites = {
>>  + .name = "configuration/capabilities",
>>  + .version_id = 1,
>>  + .minimum_version_id = 1,
>>  + .needed = vmstate_capabilites_needed,
>>  + .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
>>  + VMSTATE_UINT32_V(caps_count, SaveState, 1),
>>  + VMSTATE_VARRAY_UINT32_ALLOC(capabilities, SaveState, caps_count, 1,
>>  + vmstate_info_uint8, uint8_t),
>>  + VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
>>  + }
>>  +};
>>  +
>>   static const VMStateDescription vmstate_configuration = {
>>       .name = "configuration",
>>       .version_id = 1,
>>  @@ -404,6 +504,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_configuration = 
>> {
>>       },
>>       .subsections = (const VMStateDescription*[]) {
>>           &vmstate_target_page_bits,
>>  + &vmstate_capabilites,
>>           NULL
>>       }
>>   };
>>  --
>>  2.20.1
> --
> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK

Regards,
Yury



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]