qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 3/3] intel_iommu: add scalable-mode option to m


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 3/3] intel_iommu: add scalable-mode option to make scalable mode work
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:46:29 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 01:09:13PM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> This patch adds an option to provide flexibility for user to expose
> Scalable Mode to guest. User could expose Scalable Mode to guest by
> the config as below:
> 
> "-device intel-iommu,caching-mode=on,scalable-mode=on"
> 
> The Linux iommu driver has supported scalable mode. Please refer below
> patch set:
> 
>     https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2985279.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/i386/intel_iommu.c          | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h |  6 ++++++
>  include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h  |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index 3664a00..447fdf3 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -2492,6 +2492,17 @@ static bool vtd_process_inv_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s)
>          }
>          break;
>  
> +    /*
> +     * TODO: the entity of below two cases will be implemented in future 
> series.
> +     * To make guest (which integrates scalable mode support patch set in
> +     * iommu driver) work, just return true is enough so far.

When you repost, could you mention about what tests have you done?  I
can think of some general usages:

Device matrix:

- virtio-net, vhost=on|off
- device assignment

Configuration matrix:

- legacy/scalable
- passthrough=on|off

I believe smoke test (like netperf a few seconds, or even ping) would
be enough, cover some (or all, which would be very nice to have :) of
above scenarios.

> +     */
> +    case VTD_INV_DESC_PC:
> +        break;
> +
> +    case VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB:
> +        break;
> +
>      case VTD_INV_DESC_WAIT:
>          trace_vtd_inv_desc("wait", inv_desc.val[1], inv_desc.val[0]);
>          if (!vtd_process_wait_desc(s, &inv_desc)) {
> @@ -3051,6 +3062,7 @@ static Property vtd_properties[] = {
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("aw-bits", IntelIOMMUState, aw_bits,
>                        VTD_HOST_ADDRESS_WIDTH),
>      DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("caching-mode", IntelIOMMUState, caching_mode, FALSE),
> +    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("scalable-mode", IntelIOMMUState, scalable_mode, FALSE),

Let's start with x-scalable-mode?  Less burden for all.

>      DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("dma-drain", IntelIOMMUState, dma_drain, true),
>      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>  };
> @@ -3583,6 +3595,16 @@ static void vtd_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
>          s->cap |= VTD_CAP_CM;
>      }
>  
> +    /* TODO: read cap/ecap from host to decide which cap to be exposed. */
> +    if (s->scalable_mode) {
> +        if (!s->caching_mode) {
> +            error_report("Need to set caching-mode for scalable mode");

Could I ask why?

> +            exit(1);
> +        }
> +        s->cap |= VTD_CAP_DWD | VTD_CAP_DRD;

Draining is supported now so this line is not needed.

> +        s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_SMTS | VTD_ECAP_SRS | VTD_ECAP_SLTS;
> +    }
> +
>      vtd_reset_caches(s);
>  
>      /* Define registers with default values and bit semantics */
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> index 2a753c5..b01953a 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> @@ -190,7 +190,9 @@
>  #define VTD_ECAP_EIM                (1ULL << 4)
>  #define VTD_ECAP_PT                 (1ULL << 6)
>  #define VTD_ECAP_MHMV               (15ULL << 20)
> +#define VTD_ECAP_SRS                (1ULL << 31)
>  #define VTD_ECAP_SMTS               (1ULL << 43)
> +#define VTD_ECAP_SLTS               (1ULL << 46)
>  
>  /* CAP_REG */
>  /* (offset >> 4) << 24 */
> @@ -209,6 +211,8 @@
>  #define VTD_CAP_DRAIN_READ          (1ULL << 55)
>  #define VTD_CAP_DRAIN               (VTD_CAP_DRAIN_READ | 
> VTD_CAP_DRAIN_WRITE)
>  #define VTD_CAP_CM                  (1ULL << 7)
> +#define VTD_CAP_DWD                 (1ULL << 54)
> +#define VTD_CAP_DRD                 (1ULL << 55)

These can be dropped too (see VTD_CAP_DRAIN above).

>  
>  /* Supported Adjusted Guest Address Widths */
>  #define VTD_CAP_SAGAW_SHIFT         8
> @@ -340,6 +344,8 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
>  #define VTD_INV_DESC_IEC                0x4 /* Interrupt Entry Cache
>                                                 Invalidate Descriptor */
>  #define VTD_INV_DESC_WAIT               0x5 /* Invalidation Wait Descriptor 
> */
> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB             0x6 /* PASID-IOTLB Invalidate Desc */
> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PC                 0x7 /* PASID-cache Invalidate Desc */
>  #define VTD_INV_DESC_NONE               0   /* Not an Invalidate Descriptor 
> */
>  
>  /* Masks for Invalidation Wait Descriptor*/
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> index a5da139..a04fad6 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> @@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ struct IntelIOMMUState {
>      uint8_t womask[DMAR_REG_SIZE];  /* WO (write only - read returns 0) */
>      uint32_t version;
>  
> -    bool caching_mode;          /* RO - is cap CM enabled? */
> +    bool caching_mode;              /* RO - is cap CM enabled? */
> +    bool scalable_mode;             /* RO - is Scalable Mode supported? */
>  
>      dma_addr_t root;                /* Current root table pointer */
>      bool root_extended;             /* Type of root table (extended or not) 
> */
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Regards,

-- 
Peter Xu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]