qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v4 14/44] hw/riscv/Makefile.objs: Create CON


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v4 14/44] hw/riscv/Makefile.objs: Create CONFIG_* for riscv boards
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:59:30 -0800

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 8:12 AM Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 2019-01-23 07:55, Yang Zhong wrote:
> > Add the new configs to default-configs/riscv*-sofmmu.mak.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  default-configs/riscv32-softmmu.mak |  7 +++++++
> >  default-configs/riscv64-softmmu.mak |  7 +++++++
> >  hw/riscv/Makefile.objs              | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> >  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/default-configs/riscv32-softmmu.mak 
> > b/default-configs/riscv32-softmmu.mak
> > index fbfd1d4e4b..65337166e1 100644
> > --- a/default-configs/riscv32-softmmu.mak
> > +++ b/default-configs/riscv32-softmmu.mak
> > @@ -12,3 +12,10 @@ CONFIG_PCI_EXPRESS_GENERIC_BRIDGE=y
> >
> >  CONFIG_VGA=y
> >  CONFIG_VGA_PCI=y
> > +
> > +CONFIG_SPIKE=y
> > +CONFIG_HART=y
> > +CONFIG_SIFIVE_E=y
> > +CONFIG_SIFIVE=y
> > +CONFIG_SIFIVE_U=y
> > +CONFIG_RISCV_VIRT=y
> > diff --git a/default-configs/riscv64-softmmu.mak 
> > b/default-configs/riscv64-softmmu.mak
> > index fbfd1d4e4b..65337166e1 100644
> > --- a/default-configs/riscv64-softmmu.mak
> > +++ b/default-configs/riscv64-softmmu.mak
> > @@ -12,3 +12,10 @@ CONFIG_PCI_EXPRESS_GENERIC_BRIDGE=y
> >
> >  CONFIG_VGA=y
> >  CONFIG_VGA_PCI=y
> > +
> > +CONFIG_SPIKE=y
> > +CONFIG_HART=y
> > +CONFIG_SIFIVE_E=y
> > +CONFIG_SIFIVE=y
> > +CONFIG_SIFIVE_U=y
> > +CONFIG_RISCV_VIRT=y
> > diff --git a/hw/riscv/Makefile.objs b/hw/riscv/Makefile.objs
> > index 1dde01d39d..79bfb3abf9 100644
> > --- a/hw/riscv/Makefile.objs
> > +++ b/hw/riscv/Makefile.objs
> > @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
> > -obj-y += riscv_htif.o
> > -obj-y += riscv_hart.o
> > -obj-y += sifive_e.o
> > -obj-y += sifive_clint.o
> > -obj-y += sifive_prci.o
> > -obj-y += sifive_plic.o
> > -obj-y += sifive_test.o
> > -obj-y += sifive_u.o
> > -obj-y += sifive_uart.o
> > -obj-y += spike.o
> > -obj-y += virt.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SPIKE) += riscv_htif.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_HART) += riscv_hart.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SIFIVE_E) += sifive_e.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SIFIVE) += sifive_clint.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SIFIVE) += sifive_prci.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SIFIVE) += sifive_plic.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SIFIVE) += sifive_test.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SIFIVE_U) += sifive_u.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SIFIVE) += sifive_uart.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SPIKE) += spike.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_VIRT) += virt.o
>
> Looks reasonable to me, so I dare to say:
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>
> ... but I'm not an expert here, I hope some of the RISC-V maintainers
> could chime in?

Looks right to me

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>

Alistair

>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]