[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:56:33 +0100 |
* Adhemerval Zanella:
> On 27/12/2018 16:09, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Adhemerval Zanella:
>>
>>> Also for glibc standpoint, although reverting it back to use getdents
>>> syscall for non-LFS mode might fix this issue for architectures that
>>> provides non-LFS getdents syscall it won't be a fix for architectures
>>> that still provides off_t different than off64_t *and* only provides
>>> getdents64 syscall.
>>>
>>> Currently we only have nios2 and csky (unfortunately). But since generic
>>> definition for off_t and off64_t still assumes non-LFS support, all new
>>> 32-bits ports potentially might carry the issue.
>>
>> For csky, we could still change the type of the non-standard d_off
>> field to long long int. This way, only telldir would have to fail
>> when truncation is necessary, as mentioned below:
>
> I think it makes no sense to continue making non-LFS as default for
> newer 32 bits ports, the support will be emulated with LFS syscalls.
Sorry, I don't see how this matters. seekdir and telldir are NOT
affected by LFS.
Re: [Qemu-devel] d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation, Adhemerval Zanella, 2018/12/27
Re: [Qemu-devel] d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation, Joseph Myers, 2018/12/31
Re: [Qemu-devel] d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation, Dmitry V. Levin, 2018/12/27
Re: [Qemu-devel] d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation, Andy Lutomirski, 2018/12/28