[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 v4 4/4] i386: allow to load initrd below
From: |
Li Zhijian |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 v4 4/4] i386: allow to load initrd below 4G for recent linux |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Dec 2018 15:20:43 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 |
On 12/28/2018 4:31 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 11:10:30AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:32:13AM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
/* highest address for loading the initrd */
- if (protocol >= 0x203) {
+ if (protocol >= 0x20c &&
+ lduw_p(header+0x236) & XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G) {
+ /*
+ * Although kernel allows initrd loading to above 4G,
+ * it just makes it as large as possible while still staying below 4G
+ * since current BIOS always loads initrd below pcms->below_4g_mem_size
+ */
+ initrd_max = UINT32_MAX;
+ } else if (protocol >= 0x203) {
initrd_max = ldl_p(header+0x22c);
} else {
initrd_max = 0x37ffffff;
I still have trouble understanding the above.
Anyone else wants to comment / help rephrase the comment
and commit log so it's readable?
The comment seems to contradict what I see on the code:
| Although kernel allows initrd loading to above 4G,
Sounds correct.
| it just makes it as large as possible while still staying below 4G
I'm not a native English speaker, but I believe "it" here should
be interpreted as "the kernel", which would be incorrect. It's
this QEMU function that limits initrd_max to a uint32 value, not
the kernel.
| since current BIOS always loads initrd below pcms->below_4g_mem_size
I don't know why the BIOS is mentioned here. The
below_4g_mem_size limit comes from these 2 lines inside
load_linux():
if (initrd_max >= pcms->below_4g_mem_size - pcmc->acpi_data_size) {
initrd_max = pcms->below_4g_mem_size - pcmc->acpi_data_size - 1;
}
In addition to that, initrd_max is uint32_t simply because QEMU
doesn't support the 64-bit boot protocol (specifically the
ext_ramdisk_image field),
Thanks for explaining this :), i'm not clear before.
so all talk about below_4g_mem_size
seems to be just a distraction.
All that said, I miss one piece of information here: is
XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G really supposed to override
header+0x22c? linux/Documentation/x86/boot.txt isn't clear about
that. Is there any reference that can help us confirm this?
Good question.
Since i'm not familiar with boot protocol, at the beginning, i also CCed to
LKML for helps
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/10/82
Ingo said:
> If XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G is not > set, then you most likely
are on a 32-bit kernel and there are more > fundamental limits (even
if you were to load it above the 2 GB mark, you > would be limited by
the size of kernel memory.) > > So, in case you are wondering: the
bootloader that broke when setting > the initrd_max field above 2 GB
was, of course, Grub. > > So just use XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G.
There is no need for a new flag > or new field. That's nice, and
that's the best solution!
that make me to believe that if XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G is set, BELOW_4G is
allowed too.
if above is credible, might be we can update the comments like:
-------
QEMU doesn't support the 64-bit boot protocol (specifically the
ext_ramdisk_image field).
In addition, kernel allows to load initrd above 4G if
XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G is set,
so we believe that load initrd below 4G is allowed too.
For simplicity, so just set initrd_max to UINT32_MAX is enough and safe.
-------
Thanks
Zhijian