qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] checkpatch: checker for comment block


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] checkpatch: checker for comment block
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:31:18 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:

> On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 06:29, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > On 13/12/18 19:21, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 18:07, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >>> On 13/12/18 19:01, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >>>> I sent a patch to do this a little while back:
>> >>>>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10561557/
>
>> >>>> Personally I think we should just commit my patch, and then
>> >>>> we can stop having people manually pointing out where
>> >>>> submitters' patches don't match CODING_STYLE.
>>
>> Concur.  It has my R-by, modulo a commit message tweak.
>
> I have to admit I never really understood what tweak
> you wanted making to the commit message. I'm happy
> to make it clearer: do you want to suggest a rewording?

The commit message claims "(The only changes needed are that Linux's
checkpatch.pl WARN() function takes an extra argument that ours does
not.)"  This isn't the case.  You also dropped the kernel's "Networking
with an initial /*" special case.

The simplest way to fix an incorrect claim is to delete it :)

If you want to explain what you changed, you could say something like
"(The only changes needed are that Linux's checkpatch.pl WARN() function
takes an extra argument that ours does not, and the kernel has a special
case for networking code we don't want.)"



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]