qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 17/36] spapr: add device tree support for the


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 17/36] spapr: add device tree support for the XIVE exploitation mode
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:31:55 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:57:10AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> The XIVE interface for the guest is described in the device tree under
> the "interrupt-controller" node. A couple of new properties are
> specific to XIVE :
> 
>  - "reg"
> 
>    contains the base address and size of the thread interrupt
>    managnement areas (TIMA), for the User level and for the Guest OS
>    level. Only the Guest OS level is taken into account today.
> 
>  - "ibm,xive-eq-sizes"
> 
>    the size of the event queues. One cell per size supported, contains
>    log2 of size, in ascending order.
> 
>  - "ibm,xive-lisn-ranges"
> 
>    the IRQ interrupt number ranges assigned to the guest for the IPIs.
> 
> and also under the root node :
> 
>  - "ibm,plat-res-int-priorities"
> 
>    contains a list of priorities that the hypervisor has reserved for
>    its own use. OPAL uses the priority 7 queue to automatically
>    escalate interrupts for all other queues (DD2.X POWER9). So only
>    priorities [0..6] are allowed for the guest.
> 
> Extend the sPAPR IRQ backend with a new handler to populate the DT
> with the appropriate "interrupt-controller" node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> ---
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h  |  2 ++
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h |  2 ++
>  hw/intc/spapr_xive_hcall.c  | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c              |  3 +-
>  hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c          | 17 ++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> index c854ae527808..cfdc1f86e713 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ typedef struct sPAPRIrq {
>      void (*free)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num);
>      qemu_irq (*qirq)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq);
>      void (*print_info)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Monitor *mon);
> +    void (*dt_populate)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, uint32_t nr_servers,
> +                        void *fdt, uint32_t phandle);
>  } sPAPRIrq;
>  
>  extern sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_xics;
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h
> index 418511f3dc10..5b3fab192d41 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h
> @@ -65,5 +65,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_priority_is_valid(uint8_t priority);
>  typedef struct sPAPRMachineState sPAPRMachineState;
>  
>  void spapr_xive_hcall_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr);
> +void spapr_dt_xive(sPAPRXive *xive, int nr_servers, void *fdt,
> +                   uint32_t phandle);
>  
>  #endif /* PPC_SPAPR_XIVE_H */
> diff --git a/hw/intc/spapr_xive_hcall.c b/hw/intc/spapr_xive_hcall.c
> index 52e4e23995f5..66c78aa88500 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/spapr_xive_hcall.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/spapr_xive_hcall.c
> @@ -890,3 +890,65 @@ void spapr_xive_hcall_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
>      spapr_register_hypercall(H_INT_SYNC, h_int_sync);
>      spapr_register_hypercall(H_INT_RESET, h_int_reset);
>  }
> +
> +void spapr_dt_xive(sPAPRXive *xive, int nr_servers, void *fdt, uint32_t 
> phandle)
> +{
> +    int node;
> +    uint64_t timas[2 * 2];
> +    /* Interrupt number ranges for the IPIs */
> +    uint32_t lisn_ranges[] = {
> +        cpu_to_be32(0),
> +        cpu_to_be32(nr_servers),
> +    };
> +    uint32_t eq_sizes[] = {
> +        cpu_to_be32(12), /* 4K */
> +        cpu_to_be32(16), /* 64K */
> +        cpu_to_be32(21), /* 2M */
> +        cpu_to_be32(24), /* 16M */
> +    };
> +    /* The following array is in sync with the 'spapr_xive_priority_is_valid'
> +     * routine above. The O/S is expected to choose priority 6.
> +     */
> +    uint32_t plat_res_int_priorities[] = {
> +        cpu_to_be32(7),    /* start */
> +        cpu_to_be32(0xf8), /* count */
> +    };
> +    gchar *nodename;
> +
> +    /* Thread Interrupt Management Area : User (ring 3) and OS (ring 2) */
> +    timas[0] = cpu_to_be64(xive->tm_base + 3 * (1ull << TM_SHIFT));
> +    timas[1] = cpu_to_be64(1ull << TM_SHIFT);
> +    timas[2] = cpu_to_be64(xive->tm_base + 2 * (1ull << TM_SHIFT));

Don't you have symbolic constants for the ring numbers, instead of '2'
and '3' above?

> +    timas[3] = cpu_to_be64(1ull << TM_SHIFT);
> +
> +    nodename = g_strdup_printf("address@hidden" PRIx64,
> +                               xive->tm_base + 3 * (1 << TM_SHIFT));
> +    _FDT(node = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, 0, nodename));
> +    g_free(nodename);
> +
> +    _FDT(fdt_setprop_string(fdt, node, "device_type", "power-ivpe"));
> +    _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "reg", timas, sizeof(timas)));
> +
> +    _FDT(fdt_setprop_string(fdt, node, "compatible", "ibm,power-ivpe"));
> +    _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "ibm,xive-eq-sizes", eq_sizes,
> +                     sizeof(eq_sizes)));
> +    _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "ibm,xive-lisn-ranges", lisn_ranges,
> +                     sizeof(lisn_ranges)));
> +
> +    /* For Linux to link the LSIs to the main interrupt controller.

What's the "main interrupt controller" in this context?

> +     * These properties are not in XIVE exploitation mode sPAPR
> +     * specs
> +     */
> +    _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "interrupt-controller", NULL, 0));
> +    _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, node, "#interrupt-cells", 2));
> +
> +    /* For SLOF */
> +    _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, node, "linux,phandle", phandle));
> +    _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, node, "phandle", phandle));
> +
> +    /* The "ibm,plat-res-int-priorities" property defines the priority
> +     * ranges reserved by the hypervisor
> +     */
> +    _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, 0, "ibm,plat-res-int-priorities",
> +                     plat_res_int_priorities, 
> sizeof(plat_res_int_priorities)));
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 9f8c19e56e7a..ad1692cdcd0f 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -1270,7 +1270,8 @@ static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
>      _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, 0, "#size-cells", 2));
>  
>      /* /interrupt controller */
> -    spapr_dt_xics(xics_max_server_number(spapr), fdt, PHANDLE_XICP);
> +    smc->irq->dt_populate(spapr, xics_max_server_number(spapr), fdt,
> +                          PHANDLE_XICP);
>  
>      ret = spapr_populate_memory(spapr, fdt);
>      if (ret < 0) {
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> index da6fcfaa3c52..d88a029d8c5c 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> @@ -190,6 +190,13 @@ static void spapr_irq_print_info_xics(sPAPRMachineState 
> *spapr, Monitor *mon)
>      ics_pic_print_info(spapr->ics, mon);
>  }
>  
> +static void spapr_irq_dt_populate_xics(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> +                                       uint32_t nr_servers, void *fdt,
> +                                       uint32_t phandle)
> +{
> +    spapr_dt_xics(nr_servers, fdt, phandle);
> +}
> +

It'd be nicer to change the signature of spapr_dt_xics, rather than
having this one line wrapper.

>  #define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS     0x1000
>  #define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_MSIS     \
>      (XICS_IRQ_BASE + SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI)
> @@ -203,6 +210,7 @@ sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_xics = {
>      .free        = spapr_irq_free_xics,
>      .qirq        = spapr_qirq_xics,
>      .print_info  = spapr_irq_print_info_xics,
> +    .dt_populate = spapr_irq_dt_populate_xics,
>  };
>  
>   /*
> @@ -300,6 +308,13 @@ static void spapr_irq_print_info_xive(sPAPRMachineState 
> *spapr,
>      spapr_xive_pic_print_info(spapr->xive, mon);
>  }
>  
> +static void spapr_irq_dt_populate_xive(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> +                                       uint32_t nr_servers, void *fdt,
> +                                       uint32_t phandle)
> +{
> +    spapr_dt_xive(spapr->xive, nr_servers, fdt, phandle);

Uh.. and to make the hook signature just match what we need rather
than having to have trivial wrappers in both cases.

> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * XIVE uses the full IRQ number space. Set it to 8K to be compatible
>   * with XICS.
> @@ -317,6 +332,7 @@ sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_xive = {
>      .free        = spapr_irq_free_xive,
>      .qirq        = spapr_qirq_xive,
>      .print_info  = spapr_irq_print_info_xive,
> +    .dt_populate = spapr_irq_dt_populate_xive,
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -421,4 +437,5 @@ sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_xics_legacy = {
>      .free        = spapr_irq_free_xics,
>      .qirq        = spapr_qirq_xics,
>      .print_info  = spapr_irq_print_info_xics,
> +    .dt_populate = spapr_irq_dt_populate_xics,
>  };

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]