Re: [Qemu-devel] Correction needed for R5900 instruction decoding

[Fredrik Noring]

Hi Peter,

> From the other side of things, as a submaintainer around release
> time there's often a lot of work to do and it's easy to confuse
> different patchsets or forget the status of them, so it's useful
> to have a patch series which is exactly the set of patches that
> the submitter thinks are suitable to go into the release, and it's
> less work to apply those than to fish out a subset of patches
> from a series.

Understood. Aleksandar previously indicated that he wanted an amendment
series with changes ordered by importance, which is why the two patches
were part of that series (as the first ones).

> So overall, I think my suggestion would be that the best move
> from here would be for Fred to send a patchset with the changes
> for 3.1 and only those changes. Could you do that, please?

Yes, I will post a separate series for review immediately.

Fredrik