|
From: | Guenter Roeck |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Deprecate the "collie" machine and Strongarm devices |
Date: | Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:09:29 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
On 10/29/18 6:24 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 27 October 2018 at 12:04, Guenter Roeck <address@hidden> wrote:On 10/26/18 3:12 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:Hi Guenter; there's a proposal here to deprecate (and eventually remove) the 'collie' board (strongarm) from QEMU. Is that one of the ones you're currently using in your automated testing of Linux kernels on QEMU?Yes. I can run the test with older versions of qemu, so it is ok for me if it is removed (as long as that removal is not backported).Mmm, but if we have an active user who's testing them then they probably shouldn't be in the frontline of boards to remove. Which other boards do you test with mainline QEMU?
For arm: akita ast2500-evb beagle beaglexm borzoi collie cubieboard imx25-pdk integratorcp kzm mainstone midway mps2-an385 overo palmetto-bmc raspi2 realview-eb realview-eb-mpcore realview-pb-a8 realview-pbx-a9 romulus-bmc sabrelite smdkc210 spitz terrier tosa versatileab versatilepb vexpress-a15 vexpress-a15-a7 vexpress-a9 witherspoon-bmc xilinx-zynq-a9 z2 Though not all of them are supported by upstream qemu. For some of them I carry local patches, for others I use out-of-tree versions of qemu (beagle/beaglexm). Guenter
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |