[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?

From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:28:27 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0

On 18/10/2018 15:06, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Device "qxl" creates a memory region "qxl.vgavram" with a size taken
> from uint32_t property "ram_size", silently rounded up to the next power
> of two.  It uses &error_fatal for error handling.

That's good to some extent---it means that the core code _is_ ready for
handling ENOMEM in this part of QEMU, it's just the device that doesn't
use it.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]