qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 2/4] Introduce attributes to qem


From: Artem Pisarenko
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 2/4] Introduce attributes to qemu timer subsystem
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 19:07:33 +0600

Yes, but without words ..."when they fire" in attributes comments.

ср, 17 окт. 2018 г. в 17:24, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>:

> On 17/10/2018 12:57, Artem Pisarenko wrote:
> >> Further down in this patch the notation is QEMU_TIMER_ATTR_<id>, which I
> >> think is clearer because QEMU_TIMER_ATTR(id) looks like a (non-existent)
> >> macro.  Please use the QEMU_TIMER_ATTR_<id> notation consistently.
> >
> > Yes, I've just forgot to update comments after previous patch version,
> > where it actually was macro.
> >
> >> What is the purpose of this bit?  I guess it's just here as a
> >> placeholder because no real bits have been defined yet.  Hopefully the
> >> next patch removes it (/* This placeholder is removed in the next patch
> >> */ would be a nice way to document this for reviewers).
> >
> > It's just to prevent compilation errors, as required by
> > https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#Split_up_long_patches
> >
> >> The enum isn't needed and makes debugging harder since the bit number is
> >> implicit in the enum ordering.  This alternative is clearer and more
> >> concise:
> >>
> >>   #define QEMU_TIMER_ATTR_foo BIT(n)
> >
> > Agree.
>
> Like this?
>
> ...
>
> --

С уважением,
  Артем Писаренко


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]