qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] hw/arm/smmu-common: Fix the name of the iom


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] hw/arm/smmu-common: Fix the name of the iommu memory regions
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:24:26 +0100

On 25 September 2018 at 15:16, Auger Eric <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 9/25/18 4:09 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 21 September 2018 at 08:01, Eric Auger <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> At the point smmu_find_add_as() gets called, the bus number might
>>> not be computed. Let's change the name of IOMMU memory region and
>>> just use the devfn and an incrementing index.
>>>
>>> The name only is used for debug.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>  hw/arm/smmu-common.c | 6 +++---
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>>> index 55c75d65d2..3f55cfd193 100644
>>> --- a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>>> +++ b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>>> @@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ static AddressSpace *smmu_find_add_as(PCIBus *bus, void 
>>> *opaque, int devfn)
>>>      SMMUState *s = opaque;
>>>      SMMUPciBus *sbus = g_hash_table_lookup(s->smmu_pcibus_by_busptr, bus);
>>>      SMMUDevice *sdev;
>>> +    static uint index;
>>
>> "uint" isn't a standard type (and causes a build failure on
>> at least one of my build systems). Did you mean "unsigned int" ?
> Hum yes, I did. Shall I repost or do you fix it directly?

I've fixed it up in my v2 pull request.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]