qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] x86_iommu/amd: Enable Guest virtual APIC su


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] x86_iommu/amd: Enable Guest virtual APIC support
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 12:52:33 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:49:49AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Now that amd-iommu support interrupt remapping, enable the GASup in IVRS
> table and GASup in extended feature register to indicate that IOMMU
> support guest virtual APIC mode.
> 
> Note that the GAMSup is set to zero to indicate that  Guest Virtual
> APIC does not support advanced interrupt features (i.e virtualized
> interrupts using the guest virtual APIC).
> 
> See Table 21 from IOMMU spec for interrupt virtualization controls
> 
> IOMMU spec: https://support.amd.com/TechDocs/48882_IOMMU.pdf
> 
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <address@hidden>
> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 3 ++-
>  hw/i386/amd_iommu.h  | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 5c2c638..1cbc8ba 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -2565,7 +2565,8 @@ build_amd_iommu(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker)
>      build_append_int_noprefix(table_data,
>                               (48UL << 30) | /* HATS   */
>                               (48UL << 28) | /* GATS   */
> -                             (1UL << 2),    /* GTSup  */
> +                             (1UL << 2)   | /* GTSup  */
> +                             (1UL << 6),    /* GASup  */

Sorry if I misunderstood - is this for nested?

I'm a bit confused here... IIUC in your previous patches you didn't
really implement guest_mode==1 case in IRTEs.  So if you have this set
then the guest should be able to setup IRTEs with guest_mode==1?  How
did it work?

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]