qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pc: make sure that guest isn't able to unplug t


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pc: make sure that guest isn't able to unplug the first cpu
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 16:25:12 +0200

On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 16:02:39 +0200
Greg Kurz <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:07:10 +0200
> Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > The first cpu unplug wasn't ever supported and corresponding
> > monitor/qmp commands refuse to unplug it. However guest is able
> > to issue eject request either using following command:
> >   # echo 1 >/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/firmware_node/eject  
> 
> I can't reproduce the issue with a pc guest and current master...
> 
> All I seem to get is an error in dmesg:
> 
> [   97.435446] processor cpu0: Offline failed.

To be able to unplug CPU0 one need to set CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0=y
(I've tested it with a RHLE7 kernel)
 
> > or directly writing to cpu hotplug registers, which makes
> > qemu crash with SIGSEGV following back trace:
> > 
> >    kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer ()
> >        while (ring->first != ring->last)
> >    ...
> >    qemu_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer
> >    prepare_mmio_access
> >    flatview_read_continue
> >    flatview_read
> >    address_space_read_full
> >    address_space_rw
> >    kvm_cpu_exec(cpu!0)
> >    qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn
> > 
> > the reason for which is that ring == KVMState::coalesced_mmio_ring
> > happens to be a part of 1st CPU that was uplugged by guest.
> > 
> > Fix it by forbidding 1st cpu unplug from guest side and in addition
> > remove CPU0._EJ0 ACPI method to make clear that unplug of the first
> > CPU is not supported.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > CCing spapr and s390x folks in case targets need to prevent 1st CPU unplug 
> > as well
> >   
> 
> A spapr guest can _release_ the first cpu by doing something like:
> 
> # echo -n "/cpus/PowerPC,address@hidden" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/release
> 
> But AFAIK, this doesn't unplug the cpu from a QEMU standpoint.
Good,
so only x86 fix should be fixed.


> > CC: address@hidden
> > CC: address@hidden
> > CC: address@hidden
> > CC: address@hidden
> > CC: address@hidden
> > CC: address@hidden
> > ---
> >  hw/acpi/cpu.c | 10 ++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/cpu.c b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> > index 5ae595e..4bb8371 100644
> > --- a/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> > +++ b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static void cpu_hotplug_wr(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, 
> > uint64_t data,
> >              DeviceState *dev = NULL;
> >              HotplugHandler *hotplug_ctrl = NULL;
> >  
> > -            if (!cdev->cpu) {
> > +            if (!cdev->cpu || cdev->cpu == first_cpu) {
> >                  trace_cpuhp_acpi_ejecting_invalid_cpu(cpu_st->selector);
> >                  break;
> >              }
> > @@ -541,9 +541,11 @@ void build_cpus_aml(Aml *table, MachineState *machine, 
> > CPUHotplugFeatures opts,
> >                  aml_buffer(madt_buf->len, (uint8_t *)madt_buf->data)));
> >              g_array_free(madt_buf, true);
> >  
> > -            method = aml_method("_EJ0", 1, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> > -            aml_append(method, aml_call1(CPU_EJECT_METHOD, uid));
> > -            aml_append(dev, method);
> > +            if (CPU(arch_ids->cpus[i].cpu) != first_cpu) {
> > +                method = aml_method("_EJ0", 1, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> > +                aml_append(method, aml_call1(CPU_EJECT_METHOD, uid));
> > +                aml_append(dev, method);
> > +            }
> >  
> >              method = aml_method("_OST", 3, AML_SERIALIZED);
> >              aml_append(method,  
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]