qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/20] target/arm: Fix arm_current_el for user-o


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/20] target/arm: Fix arm_current_el for user-only
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:51:09 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

On 08/17/2018 09:03 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 August 2018 at 05:21, Richard Henderson
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Saves about 12k code size in qemu-aarch64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target/arm/cpu.h | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
>> index 2d6d7d03aa..aedaf2631e 100644
>> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
>> @@ -1958,6 +1958,9 @@ static inline bool arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(CPUARMState 
>> *env)
>>   */
>>  static inline int arm_current_el(CPUARMState *env)
>>  {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>> +    return 0;
>> +#else
>>      if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M)) {
>>          return arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env) ||
>>              !(env->v7m.control[env->v7m.secure] & 1);
>> @@ -1984,6 +1987,7 @@ static inline int arm_current_el(CPUARMState *env)
>>
>>          return 1;
>>      }
>> +#endif
> 
> Again, the #ifdeffery here should be unnecessary ? env->pstate,
> env->uncached_cpsr, etc should be set so that we return the
> right thing.

We get the right result, but you should have a look at how large the expansion
of this function is.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]