On 7 August 2018 at 15:57, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden> wrote:
* Gerd Hoffmann (address@hidden) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:19:48AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
From: "Remy Noel" <address@hidden>
When removing a secondary-vga device and then adding it back (or adding
an other one), qemu aborts with:
"RAMBlock "0000:00:02.0/vga.vram" already registered, abort!".
It is caused by the vram staying registered, preventing vga replugging.
David? Does that look ok?
This balances the
vmstate_register_ram(&s->vram, s->global_vmstate ? NULL : DEVICE(obj));
call in vga_common_init(). I'm wondering whenever the manual cleanup is
actually needed in case owner is not NULL?
I can't see anyone who is calling unregister_ram or the functions it
calls as part of generic device cleanup, so I think it IS needed
to manually do it.
Which is a bit worrying since we have vastly more register's than
unregister's.
Paolo suggested in an email last month that vmstate_unregister_ram()
should simply not exist, because it doesn't actually do anything useful:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-07/msg01125.html
(ie it was added in the first place because we'd ended up with
two identically named ramblocks, but that only happened because
a reference-counting bug meant we hadn't deleted the first one
properly before creating the second.)
So I think that the bug reported in this thread is similar:
the problem is not that we're not calling vmstate_unregister_ram(),
but that when the first instance of secondary-vga is removed
it is not correctly destroying the ramblock.