[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/vvfat: Fix crash when reporting error abo
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/vvfat: Fix crash when reporting error about too many files in directory |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 12:49:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) |
Am 24.07.2018 um 11:56 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben:
> On 23.07.2018 16:33, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 18.07.2018 um 17:28 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben:
> >> When using the vvfat driver with a directory that contains too many files,
> >> QEMU currently crashes. We are trying to print the wrong path variable
> >> here.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >> block/vvfat.c | 3 +--
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/block/vvfat.c b/block/vvfat.c
> >> index fc41841..6ae7458 100644
> >> --- a/block/vvfat.c
> >> +++ b/block/vvfat.c
> >> @@ -975,8 +975,7 @@ static int init_directories(BDRVVVFATState* s,
> >> if (mapping->mode & MODE_DIRECTORY) {
> >> mapping->begin = cluster;
> >> if(read_directory(s, i)) {
> >> - error_setg(errp, "Could not read directory %s",
> >> - mapping->path);
> >> + error_setg(errp, "Could not read directory \"%s\"",
> >> s->path);
> >
> > Hm, I'm not sure if that's right. Before this patch we were printing
> > the name of the subdirectory that couldn't be loaded, now it's the
> > parent directory.
> >
> > My test case where this difference is visible is a subdirectory with
> > chmod 000.
>
> Right.
>
> >> return -1;
> >> }
> >> mapping = array_get(&(s->mapping), i);
> >
> > Maybe the right solution would be moving the reloading of mapping to
> > between the read_directory() call and the error path?
>
> No, that does not work either. The problem seems to be that
> read_directory() is changing the mapping->path pointer to something
> invalid in between, but I've been unable to track it down where it
> happens. This patch here seems to work for me, though:
>
> diff --git a/block/vvfat.c b/block/vvfat.c
> index fc41841..f2e7d50 100644
> --- a/block/vvfat.c
> +++ b/block/vvfat.c
> @@ -973,10 +973,10 @@ static int init_directories(BDRVVVFATState* s,
> mapping = array_get(&(s->mapping), i);
>
> if (mapping->mode & MODE_DIRECTORY) {
> + char *path = mapping->path;
> mapping->begin = cluster;
> if(read_directory(s, i)) {
> - error_setg(errp, "Could not read directory %s",
> - mapping->path);
> + error_setg(errp, "Could not read directory %s", path);
> return -1;
> }
> mapping = array_get(&(s->mapping), i);
>
> Does this look reasonable for you, too?
I can't say I understand what's going on (the change I suggested did
work for my test case, without valgrind errors), but the above patch
doesn't look wrong to me at least.
Kevin