[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Zero out the host's `msg_control` buffer
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Zero out the host's `msg_control` buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:54:17 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.0 |
Hi Jonas,
You forgot to notify the maintainers, see
https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#CC_the_relevant_maintainer :
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f linux-user/syscall.c
Riku Voipio <address@hidden> (maintainer:Linux user)
Laurent Vivier <address@hidden> (reviewer:Linux user)
address@hidden (open list:All patches CC here)
On 07/10/2018 08:32 PM, Jonas Schievink wrote:
> (Apparently I messed up my git config for the last email so it didn't
> send the correct name - please bear with me, this is my first time
> submitting a patch to a mailing list. I've also added a link to the
> upstream bug in the commit description.)
>
> If this is not done, qemu would drop any control message after the first
> one.
>
> This is because glibc's `CMSG_NXTHDR` macro accesses the uninitialized
> cmsghdr's length field in order to find out if the message fits into the
> `msg_control` buffer, wrongly assuming that it doesn't because the
> length field contains garbage. Accessing the length field is fine for
> completed messages we receive from the kernel, but is - as far as I know
> - not needed since the kernel won't return such an invalid cmsghdr in
> the first place.
>
> This is tracked as this glibc bug:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13500
>
> It's probably also a good idea to bail with an error if `CMSG_NXTHDR`
> returns NULL but `TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR` doesn't (ie. we still expect
> cmsgs).
This misses your Signed-off-by:
https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#Patch_emails_must_include_a_Signed-off-by:_line
> ---
> linux-user/syscall.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
> index e4b1b7d7da..77ce173b27 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
> @@ -3845,6 +3845,8 @@ static abi_long do_sendrecvmsg_locked(int fd, struct
> target_msghdr *msgp,
> msg.msg_control = alloca(msg.msg_controllen);
> msg.msg_flags = tswap32(msgp->msg_flags);
>
> + memset(msg.msg_control, 0, msg.msg_controllen);
> +
> count = tswapal(msgp->msg_iovlen);
> target_vec = tswapal(msgp->msg_iov);
Do you mind swapping:
> msg.msg_control = alloca(msg.msg_controllen);
> + memset(msg.msg_control, 0, msg.msg_controllen);
> +
> msg.msg_flags = tswap32(msgp->msg_flags);
With your Signed-off-by:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
Regards,
Phil.