|
From: | Eric Blake |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/9] block: Fix bdrv_co_truncate overlap check |
Date: | Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:09:27 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 |
On 07/05/2018 02:37 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
If we are growing the image and potentially using preallocation for the new area, we need to make sure that no write requests are made to the "preallocated" area which address@hidden, @offset), not address@hidden, offset * 2
s/which/which is/
- @old_size). Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden> --- block/io.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c index d07849fa96..ed18eb0ca3 100644 --- a/block/io.c +++ b/block/io.c @@ -3070,7 +3070,8 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_truncate(BdrvChild *child, int64_t offset, }bdrv_inc_in_flight(bs);- tracked_request_begin(&req, bs, offset, new_bytes, BDRV_TRACKED_TRUNCATE); + tracked_request_begin(&req, bs, offset - new_bytes, new_bytes, + BDRV_TRACKED_TRUNCATE);
Is it any more legible to do s/offset - new_bytes/old_size/, since those are equivalent?
/* If we are growing the image and potentially using preallocation for the* new area, we need to make sure that no write requests are made to it
-- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |