[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: Fix some pycodestyle-3 complaints
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: Fix some pycodestyle-3 complaints |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:23:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel P. Berrangé <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:35:51AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Fix the following issues:
>>
>> common.py:873:13: E129 visually indented line with same indent as next
>> logical line
>> common.py:1766:5: E741 ambiguous variable name 'l'
>> common.py:1784:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function
>> definition, found 1
>> common.py:1833:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function
>> definition, found 1
>> common.py:1843:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function
>> definition, found 1
>> visit.py:181:18: E127 continuation line over-indented for visual indent
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> scripts/qapi/common.py | 15 +++++++++------
>> scripts/qapi/visit.py | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <address@hidden>
>
>
> If we care about pycodestyle-3 compliance, it is probably worth adding
> that to 'make check' to avoid people introducing regressions.
It's not spotless, yet:
$ pycodestyle-3 scripts/qapi-gen.py scripts/qapi/*.py
scripts/qapi/commands.py:66:80: E501 line too long (93 > 79 characters)
scripts/qapi/common.py:818:49: E261 at least two spaces before inline comment
scripts/qapi/visit.py:24:80: E501 line too long (86 > 79 characters)
scripts/qapi/visit.py:117:80: E501 line too long (88 > 79 characters)
scripts/qapi/visit.py:154:80: E501 line too long (87 > 79 characters)
scripts/qapi/visit.py:167:80: E501 line too long (88 > 79 characters)
scripts/qapi/visit.py:237:80: E501 line too long (88 > 79 characters)
The long lines are in mcgen() arguments.
If cleaning these up is the price for automation, I guess we'll pay it.
Thanks!