[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] monitor: more comments on lock-free flei
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] monitor: more comments on lock-free fleids/funcs |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2018 13:16:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Peter Xu <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:41:09AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Regarding the subject: what are "fleids"?
>
> Ouch. :( I meant the word "fields".
Can touch that up in my tree.
>> Peter Xu <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Add some explicit comment for both Readline and cpu_set/cpu_get helpers
>> > that they do not need the mon_lock protection.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
>> > ---
>> > monitor.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
>> > index d6c3c08932..f01589f945 100644
>> > --- a/monitor.c
>> > +++ b/monitor.c
>> > @@ -207,7 +207,16 @@ struct Monitor {
>> > int suspend_cnt; /* Needs to be accessed atomically */
>> > bool skip_flush;
>> > bool use_io_thr;
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * State used only in the thread "owning" the monitor.
>> > + * If @use_io_thr, this is mon_global.mon_iothread.
>> > + * Else, it's the main thread.
>> > + * These members can be safely accessed without locks.
>> > + */
>> > ReadLineState *rs;
>> > + // other members that aren't shared
>>
>> Whoops, misunderstanding! I meant this line as a placeholder, to
>> further illustrate my intent. It should not be committed. If we need a
>> comment here, it should use /* traditional comment syntax */.
>
> My fault.
>
> Please let me know if you want me to repost... Thanks,
Can touch that up, too. No respin needed unless something more complex
comes up.
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/4] monitor: add lock to protect mon_fdsets, Peter Xu, 2018/05/24
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/4] monitor: add lock to protect mon_fdsets, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2018/05/24