[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/10] intel-iommu: remove IntelIOMMUNotifier
From: |
Auger Eric |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/10] intel-iommu: remove IntelIOMMUNotifierNode |
Date: |
Thu, 17 May 2018 11:46:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
Hi Peter,
On 05/04/2018 05:08 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> That is not really necessary. Removing that node struct and put the
> list entry directly into VTDAddressSpace. It simplfies the code a lot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> ---
> include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h | 9 ++------
> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 41 ++++++++++-------------------------
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> index 45ec8919b6..220697253f 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ typedef union VTD_IR_TableEntry VTD_IR_TableEntry;
> typedef union VTD_IR_MSIAddress VTD_IR_MSIAddress;
> typedef struct VTDIrq VTDIrq;
> typedef struct VTD_MSIMessage VTD_MSIMessage;
> -typedef struct IntelIOMMUNotifierNode IntelIOMMUNotifierNode;
>
> /* Context-Entry */
> struct VTDContextEntry {
> @@ -93,6 +92,7 @@ struct VTDAddressSpace {
> MemoryRegion iommu_ir; /* Interrupt region: 0xfeeXXXXX */
> IntelIOMMUState *iommu_state;
> VTDContextCacheEntry context_cache_entry;
> + QLIST_ENTRY(VTDAddressSpace) next;
> };
>
> struct VTDBus {
> @@ -253,11 +253,6 @@ struct VTD_MSIMessage {
> /* When IR is enabled, all MSI/MSI-X data bits should be zero */
> #define VTD_IR_MSI_DATA (0)
>
> -struct IntelIOMMUNotifierNode {
> - VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as;
> - QLIST_ENTRY(IntelIOMMUNotifierNode) next;
> -};
> -
> /* The iommu (DMAR) device state struct */
> struct IntelIOMMUState {
> X86IOMMUState x86_iommu;
> @@ -295,7 +290,7 @@ struct IntelIOMMUState {
> GHashTable *vtd_as_by_busptr; /* VTDBus objects indexed by PCIBus*
> reference */
> VTDBus *vtd_as_by_bus_num[VTD_PCI_BUS_MAX]; /* VTDBus objects indexed by
> bus number */
> /* list of registered notifiers */
> - QLIST_HEAD(, IntelIOMMUNotifierNode) notifiers_list;
> + QLIST_HEAD(, VTDAddressSpace) notifiers_list;
Wouldn't it make sense to rename notifiers_list into something more
understandable like address_spaces?
>
> /* interrupt remapping */
> bool intr_enabled; /* Whether guest enabled IR */
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index b359efd6f9..5987b48d43 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -1248,10 +1248,10 @@ static void
> vtd_interrupt_remap_table_setup(IntelIOMMUState *s)
>
> static void vtd_iommu_replay_all(IntelIOMMUState *s)
> {
> - IntelIOMMUNotifierNode *node;
> + VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as;
>
> - QLIST_FOREACH(node, &s->notifiers_list, next) {
> - memory_region_iommu_replay_all(&node->vtd_as->iommu);
> + QLIST_FOREACH(vtd_as, &s->notifiers_list, next) {
> + memory_region_iommu_replay_all(&vtd_as->iommu);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1372,7 +1372,6 @@ static void vtd_iotlb_global_invalidate(IntelIOMMUState
> *s)
>
> static void vtd_iotlb_domain_invalidate(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint16_t
> domain_id)
> {
> - IntelIOMMUNotifierNode *node;
> VTDContextEntry ce;
> VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as;
>
> @@ -1381,8 +1380,7 @@ static void vtd_iotlb_domain_invalidate(IntelIOMMUState
> *s, uint16_t domain_id)
> g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb, vtd_hash_remove_by_domain,
> &domain_id);
>
> - QLIST_FOREACH(node, &s->notifiers_list, next) {
> - vtd_as = node->vtd_as;
> + QLIST_FOREACH(vtd_as, &s->notifiers_list, next) {
> if (!vtd_dev_to_context_entry(s, pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus),
> vtd_as->devfn, &ce) &&
> domain_id == VTD_CONTEXT_ENTRY_DID(ce.hi)) {
> @@ -1402,12 +1400,11 @@ static void
> vtd_iotlb_page_invalidate_notify(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> uint16_t domain_id, hwaddr addr,
> uint8_t am)
> {
> - IntelIOMMUNotifierNode *node;
> + VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as;
> VTDContextEntry ce;
> int ret;
>
> - QLIST_FOREACH(node, &(s->notifiers_list), next) {
> - VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as = node->vtd_as;
> + QLIST_FOREACH(vtd_as, &(s->notifiers_list), next) {
> ret = vtd_dev_to_context_entry(s, pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus),
> vtd_as->devfn, &ce);
> if (!ret && domain_id == VTD_CONTEXT_ENTRY_DID(ce.hi)) {
> @@ -2344,8 +2341,6 @@ static void
> vtd_iommu_notify_flag_changed(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu,
> {
> VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as = container_of(iommu, VTDAddressSpace, iommu);
> IntelIOMMUState *s = vtd_as->iommu_state;
> - IntelIOMMUNotifierNode *node = NULL;
> - IntelIOMMUNotifierNode *next_node = NULL;
>
> if (!s->caching_mode && new & IOMMU_NOTIFIER_MAP) {
> error_report("We need to set caching-mode=1 for intel-iommu to
> enable "
> @@ -2354,21 +2349,11 @@ static void
> vtd_iommu_notify_flag_changed(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu,
> }
>
> if (old == IOMMU_NOTIFIER_NONE) {
> - node = g_malloc0(sizeof(*node));
> - node->vtd_as = vtd_as;
> - QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&s->notifiers_list, node, next);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - /* update notifier node with new flags */
> - QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(node, &s->notifiers_list, next, next_node) {
> - if (node->vtd_as == vtd_as) {
> - if (new == IOMMU_NOTIFIER_NONE) {
> - QLIST_REMOVE(node, next);
> - g_free(node);
> - }
> - return;
> - }
> + /* Insert new ones */
s/ones/one
> + QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&s->notifiers_list, vtd_as, next);
> + } else if (new == IOMMU_NOTIFIER_NONE) {
> + /* Remove old ones */
same. Not sure the comments are worth.
> + QLIST_REMOVE(vtd_as, next);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2838,12 +2823,10 @@ static void vtd_address_space_unmap(VTDAddressSpace
> *as, IOMMUNotifier *n)
>
> static void vtd_address_space_unmap_all(IntelIOMMUState *s)
> {
> - IntelIOMMUNotifierNode *node;
> VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as;
> IOMMUNotifier *n;
>
> - QLIST_FOREACH(node, &s->notifiers_list, next) {
> - vtd_as = node->vtd_as;
> + QLIST_FOREACH(vtd_as, &s->notifiers_list, next) {
> IOMMU_NOTIFIER_FOREACH(n, &vtd_as->iommu) {
> vtd_address_space_unmap(vtd_as, n);
> }
>
Thanks
Eric
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 04/10] intel-iommu: only do page walk for MAP notifiers, Peter Xu, 2018/05/03
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/10] intel-iommu: add iommu lock, Peter Xu, 2018/05/03