[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/5] qcow2: Document some maximum size constr
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/5] qcow2: Document some maximum size constraints |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Apr 2018 08:49:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
On 04/13/2018 12:08 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>>>> With 512 byte clusters and 64 bit refcount entries I still get 8 PB,
>>>> way over what's limited by the L1/L2 tables (128 GB).
>>>
>>> Do I need to make any modifications to the sentence, then?
>>
>> I guess what surprised me the first time that I read it was that it
>> suggests that this has to be taken into account when calculating the
>> physical limits of an image, while in practice it can be ignored.
>>
>> You could say something like
>>
>> Although the larger the cluster size, the larger the offsets that can
>> be covered by the refcount table, in practice these limits cannot be
>> reached because they are larger than the ones imposed by other data
>> structures.
>
> Are there any updates here? I guess I personally would just drop the
> whole paragraph, because I think it really doesn't matter...
Yeah, I need to post a v5 of this series now that 2.13 is nearly open.
>
> Also note that the maximum file size of ext4 is 16 PB (for 4 kB blocks).
> OK, it's bigger for XFS, but that still gives some perspective.
>
> Also, long before anyone is going to complain about the specification
> failing to mention that limit, they are going to complain that qemu
> refuses to open their image (because of its limit on the reftable size).
>
> Max
>
>> although I'm sure that you can come up with a better wording than mine :)
>>
>> Berto
>>
>
>
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature